Del Rio v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 102

STIPULATION AND ORDER. Case Management Statement due by 7/14/2016. Further Case Management Conference reset for 7/21/2016 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/24/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ROBERT G. HULTENG, Bar No. 071293 rhulteng@littler.com ANDREW M. SPURCHISE, Bar No. 245998 aspurchise@littler.com LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 333 Bush Street, 34th Floor San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: 415.433.1940 Facsimile: 415.399.8490 RACHAEL LAVI, Bar No. 294443 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 2049 Century Park East, 5th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90067.3107 Telephone: 310.553.0308 Fax No.: 310.553.5583 Attorneys for Defendants UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and RASIER-CA, LLC 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 RICARDO DEL RIO, a California resident, on behalf of himself, the proposed class and collective class; JOSE VALDIVIA, a California resident, on behalf of himself, the proposed class and collective class; JOSE PEREIRA, a California resident, on behalf of himself, the proposed class and collective class, Plaintiffs, v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware Corporation, RASIER-CA, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Case No. 3:15-cv-03667-EMC [Related to 3:13-cv-03826-EMC] JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FROM JUNE 30, 2016 TO JULY 21, 2016 AND TO CONTINUE RELATED DEADLINES; [PROPOSED] ORDER (modified) Complaint Filed: August 11, 2015 FAC Filed: September 21, 2015 SAC Filed: April 27, 2016 Trial Date: None set Defendants. 25 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 333 Bush Street 34th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 415.433.1940 Case No. 3:15-cv-03667-EMC JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DEADLINES 1 2 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND REQUESTED by and between the parties who have 3 to date appeared in this action, through their counsel of record, Chris Hamner and Amy Wootton of 4 the Hamner Law Offices, APC, attorneys for Plaintiffs Ricardo Del Rio, Jose Valdivia and Jose 5 Pereira (“Plaintiffs”); and Robert G. Hulteng, Andrew M. Spurchise, and Rachael Lavi of Littler 6 Mendelson, P.C., attorneys for Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier-CA, LLC 7 (“Defendants”) (collectively, the “Parties”), based upon the following recitals: 1. 8 WHEREAS, on March 24, 2016, at the hearing on Defendants’ motion to 9 dismiss, the Court stayed Plaintiff’s state claims pending the Price v. Uber Technologies, Inc. action 10 proceeding in Los Angeles Superior Court and set a further case management conference for June 11 30, 2016; 2. 12 WHEREAS, on June 2, 2016, the Court granted a temporary stay, staying this 13 matter in its entirety. The parties were ordered to meet and confer regarding the status of the case 14 and the effect of the proposed settlement in O’Connor v. Uber Technologies, Inc., Northern District 15 Case No. 13-cv-3826-EMC following the Court’s order regarding preliminary approval of the 16 proposed settlement, also before this Court, and submit a joint letter to the Court 10 days after the 17 order is issued to provide the parties’ position with respect to its impact on the case and whether the 18 stay should continue or be lifted; 19 3. 20 WHEREAS, as of filing of this stipulation, the Court has not submitted an order regarding the motion for preliminary approval in the O’Connor matter; 4. 21 WHEREAS, a short continuance of the further case management conference 22 would serve judicial economy as the Parties await the Court’s order in regards to the motion for 23 preliminary approval in the O’Connor matter. 24 STIPULATION 25 Parties hereby stipulate, agree and respectfully request that the case management conference 26 currently scheduled for June 30 at 10:30 a.m. be continued to July 21, 2016, at 1:30 p.m. and that the 27 current June 23, 2016 deadline to file a case management conference statement also be continued to 28 July 14, 2016. LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 333 Bush Street 34th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 415.433.1940 1. Case No. 3:15-cv-03667-EMC JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DEADLINES 1 2 3 Dated: June 23, 2016. 4 /s/ Rachael Lavi ROBERT G. HULTENG ANDREW M. SPURCHISE RACHAEL LAVI LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Attorneys for Defendants UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND RASIER-CA, LLC 5 6 7 8 9 Dated: June 23, 2016. 10 /s/Amy T. Wootton CHRIS HAMNER AMY T. WOOTTON HAMNER LAW OFFICES, APC Attorneys for Plaintiffs RICARDO DEL RIO, JOSE VALDIVIA AND JOSE PEREIRA 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 SIGNATURE ATTESTATION In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatories on this e-filed document. 18 19 Dated: June 23, 2016. 20 21 22 23 24 /s/ Rachael Lavi RACHAEL LAVI LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Attorneys for Defendants UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND RASIER-CA, LLC 25 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 333 Bush Street 34th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 415.433.1940 Case No. 3:15-cv-03667-EMC JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DEADLINES 1 6/24/16 9 10 RT 12 14 O ORD D IT IS S DIFIE AS MO ard M. Firmwide:141174792.3 073208.1083 dw Judge E ER H 13 HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ERED NO 11 RT U O 8 Dated: R NIA 7 S DISTRICT TE C TA Chen FO 6 seven (7) days in advance of the continued case management conference. LI 5 A 4 The case management conference currently scheduled for June 30 at 10:30 a.m. is continued to July 10:30 a.m. 21, 2016, at 1:30 p.m., and the case management conference statement shall be due on July 14, 2016, S 3 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: UNIT ED 2 N F D IS T IC T O R C 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 333 Bush Street 34th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 415.433.1940 Case No. 3:15-cv-03667-EMC JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DEADLINES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?