Del Rio v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 12

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND re 11 Stipulation filed by Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier-CA, LLC. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/14/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

CHRISTOPHER J. HAMNER, ESQ. (SBN 197117)
[e-mail]
AMY T. WOOTTON, ESQ. (SBN 188856)
[e-mail]
EVELINA SERAFINI, ESQ. – Of Counsel (SBN 187137)
[e-mail]
HAMNER LAW OFFICES, APC
555 W. 5th Street, 31st Floor
Los Angeles, California 90013
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
RICARDO DEL RIO
ROBERT G. HULTENG, Bar No. 071293
[e-mail]
JOHN C. FISH, Jr., Bar No. 160620
[e-mail]
ANDREW M. SPURCHISE, Bar No. 245998
[e-mail]
ROXANNA IRAN, Bar No. 273625
[e-mail]
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street, 20th Floor
San Francisco, California 94108.2693
Telephone:
415.433.1940
Facsimile:
415.399.8490
Attorneys for Defendants
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and
RASIER-CA, LLC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

18

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

19
20
21

RICARDO DEL RIO, on behalf of himself
and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,

22
23
24
25
26
27

v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a
Delaware Corporation, RASIER-CA, LLC,
a Delaware Limited Liability Company,
and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,

Case No. 3:15-cv-03667-EMC
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING
Complaint Filed: August 11, 2015
Trial Date: None set

Defendants.

28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108.2693
415.433.1940

Case No. 3:15-cv-03667-EMC
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING

1

Pursuant to Rule 6-1(a) of the Local Rules of the United States District for the

2

Northern District of California, Plaintiff RICARDO DEL RIO and Defendants UBER

3

TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and RASIER-CA, LLC (collectively, “Defendants”), through their

4

undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that any responsive pleadings, including any motion

5

to dismiss and/or to compel arbitration, filed by Defendants on or before September 28, 2015 shall

6

be considered timely.

7

Plaintiff filed his Complaint on August 11, 2015, and Defendants have not obtained

8

any other extensions of time to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint. No objections, arguments, or

9

defenses are waived by either party by virtue of this stipulation. This stipulation will not require the

10

alteration of any deadline already set by Court Order.

11
12

Dated: September 11, 2015

13
/s/ Roxanna Iran
ROBERT G. HULTENG
JOHN C. FISH, Jr.
ANDREW M. SPURCHISE
ROXANNA IRAN
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
Attorneys for Defendants
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND
RASIER-CA, LLC

14
15
16
17
18
19

Dated: September 11, 2015

20

S

Judge E

26
27

A

H

ER

FO

RT

25

R NIA

. Chen

dward M

NO

24

IT IS

LI

23

RT
U
O

22

/s/ Amy T. Wootton
CHRISTOPHER J. HAMNER
AMY T. WOOTTON
EVELINA SERAFINI
HAMNER LAW OFFICES, APC
Attorneys for Plaintiff
RICARDO DEL RIO

IT IS SO ORDERED:
S DIST
___________________ RICT C
TE
TA
EDWARD M. CHEN
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE DERED
SO OR
UNIT
ED

21

N

C

D T I C T Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this
*Pursuant to CivilISLocal OF
R
document has been obtained from all signatories.

Firmwide:135844817.1 073208.1083

28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108.2693
415.433.1940

Case No. 3:15-cv-03667-EMC
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING

1.