ArcSoft, Inc. v. CyberLink Corp. et al

Filing 48

STIPULATION AND ORDER granting 47 Stipulation to Extend Time to file Reply as to 10 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. Reply due by 12/1/2015. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 11/19/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/19/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

HAROLD H. DAVIS, JR. (SBN 235552)
[e-mail]
SHARONI S. FINKELSTEIN (SBN 271829)
[e-mail]
SETH A. GOLD (SBN 163220)
[e-mail]
CHRISTINA N. GOODRICH (SBN 261722)
[e-mail]
K&L GATES LLP
Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 1200
San Francisco, California 94111
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants CYBERLINK CORP.,
PERFECT CORP. (CALIFORNIA), PERFECT
CORP. (CAYMAN ISLANDS)

15

Otto O. Lee, CA Bar No. 173987
[e-mail]
Kevin Viau, CA Bar No. 275556
[e-mail]
Bonnie J. Wolf, CA Bar No. 284872
[e-mail]
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP LLP
12 South First Street, 12th Floor
San Jose, California 95113
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

16

Attorneys for Plaintiff ARCSOFT INC.

11
12
13
14

17
18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

19

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

20

ARCSOFT INC.,

21

Case No.
Plaintiff,

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
FILE REPLY RE: ARCSOFT’S
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION MOTION;
ORDER

22

vs.

23

CYBERLINK CORP., a Taiwan, R.O.C.
corporation, PERFECT CORP., a California
corporation, and PERFECT CORP., a Cayman
Islands corporation,

24
25
26

15-CV-03707-WHO

Defendants.

27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER
CASE NO.: 15-CV-03707-WHO

1

STIPULATION

2
3

Per L. R. 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff Arcsoft Inc. (“Arcsoft”) and Defendants Cyberlink Corp.,
Perfect Corp. (California), and Perfect Corp. (Cayman Islands) (collectively “Defendants” and,

4
5
6

together with Arcsoft, the “Parties”) hereby stipulate and agree, subject to the approval of the Court,
and jointly submit this Stipulation as follows:
1.

7
8

16] and supporting materials (collectively, the “Motion”).

9
10

On September 1, 2015, Arcsoft filed its Motion for Preliminary Injunction [Dkt. # 10-

2.

The Parties previously stipulated, and the Court ordered, that Defendants’ deadline to

file an opposition to the Motion would be extended from September 15, 2015 to November 10, 2015.

11
3.

Pursuant thereto, Defendants filed their opposition to the Motion along with numerous

12
13

supporting papers on November 10, 2015, rendering Arcsoft’s reply papers due November 24, 2015.
4.

14
15

and personal affairs, and will not be returning to work in the United States until November 23, 2015.

16
17

5.

On November 16, 2015, the Court postponed the hearing on Arcsoft’s Motion from

December 9, 2015 to December 16, 2015.

18
19

Arcsoft’s senior attorney, Otto O. Lee, Esq., is presently out of the country on business

6.

Given the foregoing and in consideration of the upcoming Thanksgiving holiday, the

Parties have agreed and hereby stipulate that the deadline for Arcsoft to file its reply brief in support

20
21
22
23

of its Motion for Preliminary Injunction shall be moved from November 24, 2015 to December 1,
2015.
7.

This is Arcsoft’s first request for an extension regarding the filing of its reply brief.

24

The stipulated extension shall not affect any other case date or deadline, including the December 16,

25

2015 hearing of Arcsoft’s Motion – Arcsoft’s reply is to be filed 15 days prior to said hearing, which

26

accords with ordinary motion scheduling under L.R. 7.

27
28

1
STIPULATION AND ORDER
CASE NO.: 15-CV-03707-WHO

1
2
3
4

Now, therefore, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the
Court, that:
A. Arcsoft’s time to file a reply brief in support of its Motion for a Preliminary Injunction is
moved to on or before December 1, 2015.

5
6

IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.
Dated: November 17, 2015

Respectfully submitted,

14

/s/ Kevin Viau
Otto O. Lee
Kevin Viau
Bonnie J. Wolf
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP LLP
12 South First Street, 12th Floor
San Jose, California 95113
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

/s/ Harold H. Davis
Harold H. Davis
Sharoni S. Finkelstein
Seth A. Gold
Christina N. Goodrich
K&L GATES LLP
4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1200
San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

15

Attorneys for Plaintiff Arcsoft Inc.

7
8
9
10
11
12
13

Attorneys for Defendants Cyberlink Corp.,
Perfect Corp. (California), Perfect Corp.
(Cayman Islands)

16
17
18
19

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

20
21
22
23

I hereby attest pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5.1 that concurrence in the electronic filing of this
document has been obtained from the other signatory.
Dated: November 17, 2015

/s/ Kevin Viau
Kevin Viau

24
25
26
27
28

2
STIPULATION AND ORDER
CASE NO.: 15-CV-03707-WHO

1
ORDER

2
3

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5
6

DATED: November 19, 2015

_______________________________________
The Honorable William H. Orrick
Judge of the U.S. District Court

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
STIPULATION AND ORDER
CASE NO.: 15-CV-03707-WHO