Karasek et al v. Regents of the University of California, The

Filing 117

ORDER TO EXTEND 116 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT OPPOSITION AND REPLY DATE - Response due by 2/28/2018. Reply due by 3/21/2018. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 02/23/2018. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2018)

1 IRWIN M. ZALKIN, ESQ. (SBN 89957)
DEVIN M. STOREY, ESQ. (SBN 234271)
2 ALEXANDER S. ZALKIN, ESQ. (SBN 280813)
RYAN M. COHEN, ESQ, (SBN 261313)
3 The Zalkin Law Firm, P.C.
12555 High Bluff Drive, Suite 301
4 San Diego, CA 92130
Tel: [phone]
5 Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
6
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
7
[e-mail]
8 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
9
10

BRADLEY S. PHILLIPS (SBN 85263)
[e-mail]
HAILYN J. CHEN (SBN 237436)
[e-mail]
SARA N. TAYLOR (SBN 288573)
[e-mail]
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
355 South Grand Avenue, Thirty-Fifth Floor
Los Angeles, California 90071-1560
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
JESLYN A. EVERITT (SBN 274701)
[e-mail]
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
560 Mission Street, Twenty-Seventh Floor
San Francisco, California 94105-2907
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
CHARLES F. ROBINSON (SBN 113197)
[e-mail]
MARGARET L. WU (SBN 184167)
[e-mail]
SONYA SANCHEZ (SBN 247541)
[e-mail]
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Office of the General Counsel
1111 Franklin Street, 8th Floor
Oakland, CA 94607-5200
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

11
12
13
14
15
16
17

Attorneys for Defendants
18
19

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

20

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

21 SOFIE KARASEK, individually;
NICOLETTA COMMINS, individually;
22 ARYLE BUTLER, individually,
23
24

Plaintiffs,
vs.

25 THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA, a public entity, and DOES 1
26 through 100, inclusive,
27

Case No. 3:15-cv-03717-WHO
STIPULATION AND
ORDER TO EXTEND MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGEMENT OPPOSITION
AND REPLY DATE
Judge: Hon. William H. Orrick

Defendants.

28
-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED ORDER] TO EXTEND MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGEMENT OPPOSITION AND REPLY DATE

1

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, the parties to the above entitled action, by and through their

2 respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
3

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their Fourth Amended Complaint on September 1, 2016 (Dkt.

4 No. 83);
5

WHEREAS, the Parties have completed fact discovery;

6

WHEREAS, Defendant filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (“MSJ”) on February 7,

7 2018 (Dkt. No. 114);
8

WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s response to Defendant’s MSJ is due on February 21, 2018;

9

WHEREAS, Defendant’s Reply is due on February 28, 2018;

10

WHEREAS, the hearing on Defendant’s MSJ is scheduled for March 28, 2018;

11

WHEREAS, to accommodate Plaintiff’s counsel’s and Defendant’s counsel’s work and

12 upcoming vacation schedules, the Parties have agreed to amend the due dates for Plaintiff’s
13 response and Defendant’s reply as follows:
14

•

Plaintiff’s response due date extended from February 21, 2018 to February 28, 2018

15

•

Defendant’s reply due date extended from February, 28, 2018 to March 21, 2018;

16

WHEREAS, the proposed new dates would not affect any other deadlines set by this

17 Court.
18

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiffs and Defendant, by and through their

19 undersigned attorneys, that Plaintiff’s response to Defendant’s MSJ is due on February 28, 2018
20
21

and Defendant’s reply is due on March 21, 2018.
Respectfully submitted,

22
23

DATED: February 16, 2018

THE ZALKIN LAW FIRM
IRWIN M. ZALKIN
DEVIN M. STOREY
ALEXANDER S. ZALKIN
RYAN M. COHEN

24
25
26
27
28

By:

/s/ Alexander S. Zalkin
ALEXANDER S. ZALKIN
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

3:15-cv-03717-WHO
-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE PRETRIAL SCHEDULE

1

DATED: February 16, 2018

MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
BRADLEY S. PHILLIPS
HAILYN J. CHEN
JESLYN A. EVERITT
SARA N. TAYLOR

2
3
4
5
6

By:

/s/ Jeslyn A. Everitt
JESLYN A. EVERITT
Attorneys for Defendant

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3:15-cv-03717-WHO
-3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE PRETRIAL SCHEDULE

ORDER

1
2
3

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED,

4
5 Dated: February 23, 2018
6

WILLIAM H. ORRICK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3:15-cv-03717-WHO
-4STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE PRETRIAL SCHEDULE