Karasek et al v. Regents of the University of California, The

Filing 159

ORDER granting 158 STIPULATION re 156 MOTION to Dismiss. Responses due by 2/8/2021. Replies due by 2/24/2021. Motion Hearing reset for 3/10/2021 02:00 PM via Videoconference before Judge William H. Orrick. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 1/21/2021. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/21/2021)

Case 3:15-cv-03717-WHO Document 159 Filed 01/21/21 Page 1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IRWIN M. ZALKIN, ESQ. (#89957)
DEVIN M. STOREY, ESQ. (#234271)
ALEXANDER S. ZALKIN, ESQ. (#280813)
RYAN M. COHEN, ESQ, (#261313)
The Zalkin Law Firm, P.C.
10590 West Ocean Air Drive, Suite 125
San Diego, CA 92130
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

HAILYN J. CHEN (SBN 237436)
[e-mail]
JOHN B. MAJOR (SBN 306416)
[e-mail]
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
350 South Grand Avenue, Fiftieth Floor
Los Angeles, California 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
JEROME MAYER-CANTÚ (SBN 291623)
[e-mail]
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Office of the General Counsel
1111 Franklin Street, 8th Floor
Oakland, CA 94607
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

9
10

Attorneys for The Regents of the
University of California

11
12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

SOFIE KARASEK, individually;
NICOLLETTA COMMINS, individually;
ARYLE BUTLER, individually;
Plaintiffs,
vs.
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY
OF CALIFORNIA, a public entity, and
DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,
Defendants.

22

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No: 3:15-cv-03717-WHO
STIPULATION REGARDING
PLAINTIFFS’ DEADLINE TO FILE
OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS AND
DEFENDANT’S DEADLINE TO FILE
REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS’
OPPOSITION

Judge: Hon. William H. Orrick

23
24
25
26
27
28

3:15-cv-03717-WHO
STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ DEADLINE TO FILE OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND DEFENDANT’S DEADLINE TO FILE REPLY
TO PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION

Case 3:15-cv-03717-WHO Document 159 Filed 01/21/21 Page 2 of 3

1

STIPULATION

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their Sixth Amended Complaint on December 2, 2020, Dkt.
151;
WHEREAS, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss the Sixth Amended Complaint as to
Ms. Commins’ claim on January 11, 2021, Dkt. 156;
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ current deadline to file a response to Defendant’s Motion to
Dismiss the Sixth Amended Complaint is January 25, 2021;
WHEREAS, Defendant’s current deadline to file a reply to Plaintiffs’ response is
February 1, 2021;
WHEREAS, due to pre-existing commitments for both Plaintiffs’ and Defendant’s

13

counsel, the parties have met and conferred regarding the aforementioned deadlines and have

14

agreed, pending this Court’s approval, to adjust the deadlines as follows:

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

1. Plaintiffs’ deadline to file a response to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss shall be
extended up to and including February 8, 2021;
2. Defendant’s deadline to file a reply to Plaintiffs’ response shall be extended up to
and including February 24, 2021;
WHEREAS, the Parties have entered into one stipulation thus far extending the time for
Defendant to respond to Plaintiffs’ Sixth Amended Complaint, Dkt. 152;
WHEREAS, these requested extensions will have no effect on any deadlines already
fixed by this Court in its minute entry at Dkt. 155;
WHEREAS, the hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is currently scheduled for
February 17, 2021;

27
28

3:15-cv-03717-WHO
STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ DEADLINE TO FILE OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND DEFENDANT’S DEADLINE TO FILE REPLY
TO PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION

Case 3:15-cv-03717-WHO Document 159 Filed 01/21/21 Page 3 of 3

1
2

WHEREAS, the Parties agree to move the hearing date on Defendant’s Motion to
Dismiss to March 10, 2021, or another time more convenient for the Court.

3

NOW THEREFORE, Plaintiffs’ and Defendant’s counsel respectfully request that this

4

Court enter an order extending Plaintiffs’ deadline to respond to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss

5

up to and including February 8, 2021 and Defendant’s deadline to reply to Plaintiffs’ response

6
7

up to and including February 24, 2021.

8
9

Date: January 19, 2021

THE ZALKIN LAW FIRM, P.C.

10
By:

11
12
13

Date: January 19, 2021

/s/ Alexander S. Zalkin
Alexander S. Zalkin
Attorney for Plaintiffs
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP

14
By:

15
16

/s/ John B. Major_
__
John B. Major
Attorney for Defendant

17
ORDER

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Pursuant to the Stipulation, Plaintiffs’ response to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is due on
February 8, 2021;
Defendant’s reply to Plaintiffs’ response to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is due on
February 24, 2021;
3/10/2021
The new hearing date on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is ___________________.
1/21/2021
Dated: ______________

26

______________________________
Hon. William H. Orrick
Judge of the United States District Court

27
28

3:15-cv-03717-WHO
STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ DEADLINE TO FILE OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND DEFENDANT’S DEADLINE TO FILE REPLY
TO PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION