Karasek et al v. Regents of the University of California, The
Filing
60
ORDER re 59 STIPULATION To Extend Time to Respond to Defendant's 57 MOTION to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint. Response due by 5/31/2016. Reply due by 6/7/2016. Motion Hearing set for 6/15/2016 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William H. Orrick. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 05/24/2016. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IRWIN M. ZALKIN, ESQ. (#89957)
DEVIN M. STOREY, ESQ. (#234271)
ALEXANDER S. ZALKIN, ESQ. (#280813)
RYAN M. COHEN. ESQ, (#261313)
The Zalkin Law Firm, P.C.
12555 High Bluff Drive, Suite 301
San Diego, CA 92130
Tel: 858-259-3011
Fax: 858-259-3015
Email: Irwin@zalkin.com
dms@zalkin.com
alex@zalkin.com
ryan@zalkin.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
SOFIE KARASEK, individually;
NICOLETTA COMMINS, individually;
ARYLE BUTLER, individually;
Plaintiffs,
vs.
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY
OF CALIFORNIA, a public entity, and
DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,
Defendants.
19
20
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No: 3:15-cv-03717-WHO
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S RULE
12(B)(6) MOTION TO DISMISS;
ORDER
Place: Courtroom 2, 17th Floor
Judge: Hon. William H. Orrick
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3:15-cv-03717-WHO
1
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S RULE 12(B)(6)
MOTION TO DISMISS; ORDER
1
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S RULE 12(B)(6)
2
MOTION TO DISMISS
3
4
5
6
7
8
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, the parties to the above entitled action, by and through their
respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) in this Court on April
11, 2016;
WHEREAS, Defendant filed a Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintffs’ Third Amended
Complaint (“Motion to Dismiss”) on May 9, 2016;
9
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ response to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is due on May 23, 2016;
10
WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed that Plaintiffs may have an extension of 7 days to
11
respond to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, which would make Plaintiffs’ response due on Tuesday,
12
May 31, 2016;
13
WHEREAS, currently, Defendant’s reply to Plaintiffs’ response is due on May 31, 2016;
14
WHEREAS, Defendant’s new deadline to reply to Plaintiffs’ response to Defendant’s
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Motion to Dismiss would be June 7, 2016;
WHEREAS, currently, the hearing date on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is scheduled for
June 15, 2016;
WHEREAS, if, given the new briefing schedule, the original hearing date is not convenient
for the Court, the Court will move the hearing date to _______________; and
WHEREAS, this stipulation will not alter any other date of any event or any deadline
already fixed by Court order.
22
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiffs and Defendant, by and through their
23
undersigned attorneys, that Plaintiff shall have a 7-day extension to respond to Defendant’s Rule
24
12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint, making Plaintiffs’ response due
25
on or before May 31, 2016.
26
27
28
3:15-cv-03717-WHO
2
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S RULE 12(B)(6)
MOTION TO DISMISS; ORDER
1
DATED: May 18, 2016
2
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
BRADLEY S. PHILLIPS
HAILYN J. CHEN
By:
3
4
5
DATED: May 18, 2016
THE ZALKIN LAW FIRM, P.C.
IRWIN M. ZALKIN
DEVIN M. STOREY
ALEXANDER S. ZALKIN
RYAN M. COHEN
6
7
8
By:
9
10
11
14
15
16
17
18
/s/ Alexander S. Zalkin
Alexander S. Zalkin
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
ORDER
12
13
/s/ Bradley S. Phillips
BRADLEY S. PHILLIPS
Attorneys for Defendant
Plaintiffs’ new response to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is due on Tuesday, May 31,
2016;
Defendant’s new deadline to reply to Plaintiffs’ response to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss
is due on June 7, 2016;
The hearing date on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss remains June 15, 2016.
Dated: May 24, 2016
______________________________
Hon. William H. Orrick
Judge of the United States District Court
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3:15-cv-03717-WHO
3
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S RULE 12(B)(6)
MOTION TO DISMISS; ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?