Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Ha

Filing 26

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 25 to Modify Briefing Schedule on Plaintiff Adobe Systems Incorporated's Motion for Entry of Default Judgment by Court against Defendant Lam Hoang Ha. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/4/16. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN FRANCISCO COURTHOUSE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED, a Delaware Corporation, Case No.: 3:15-cv-03721-RS [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFF ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED’S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT BY COURT AGAINST DEFENDANT LAM HOANG HA Plaintiff, v. LAM HOANG HA, an Individual; and DOES 1-10, Inclusive, Cont. Hearing Date: February 4, 2016 Time: 1:30 P.M. Location: Courtroom 3 - 17th Floor 450 Golden Gate Ave. San Francisco, CA 94102 Defendants. 19 20 Honorable Judge Richard Seeborg 21 22 23 24 [PROPOSED] ORDER 25 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the stipulation jointly submitted by the parties to modify 26 the briefing schedule on Plaintiff Adobe Systems Incorporated’s Motion for Entry of Default 27 Judgment by Court against Defendant Lam Hoang Ha is GRANTED. The hearing on Plaintiff’s 28 -1- [PROPOSED] ORDER - CASE NO.: 3:15-cv-03721-RS 1 Motion has been continued from Thursday, January 21, 2016 to Thursday, February 4, 2016. 2 The briefing schedule on Plaintiff’s Motion is modified as follows: 3 4 5 6 7 1. Defendant’s Opposition, if any, shall be filed and served on or before January 14, 2016; and 2. Plaintiff’s Reply, if any, shall be filed and served on or before January 21, 2016. 2016 January 4th IT IS SO ORDERED this ______ day of _____________, 2015. 8 9 10 11 _________________________________ HON. RICHARD SEEBORG United States District Judge Northern District of California San Francisco Courthouse 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- [PROPOSED] ORDER - CASE NO.: 3:15-cv-03721-RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?