IXI Mobile (R&D) Ltd. et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al

Filing 137

ORDER CONTINUING STAY. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 1/7/2016. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 IXI MOBILE (R&D) LTD., et al., Case No. 15-cv-03752-HSG Plaintiffs, 8 ORDER CONTINUING STAY v. 9 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD, et al., 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 Defendants. 12 IXI MOBILE (R&D) LTD., et al., 13 14 15 Plaintiffs, v. BLACKBERRY LIMITED, et al., 16 17 Defendants. IXI MOBILE (R&D) LTD., et al., 18 19 20 21 Case No. 15-cv-03754-HSG Case No. 15-cv-03755-HSG Plaintiffs, v. APPLE INC, Defendant. 22 23 On November 12, 2015, the Court granted Defendants’ motion to stay the above-captioned 24 actions pending decision by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) whether to institute inter 25 partes review (“IPR”) proceedings regarding the patent claims at issue in these lawsuits. Dkt. No. 26 133. The parties submitted a joint status report on January 5, 2016 informing the Court of the 27 PTAB’s decision to institute IPR of 52 of the 53 claims asserted here. Dkt. No. 136. In light of 28 this decision, the Court ORDERS the stay extended until the completion of the IPR process, for 1 2 the reasons explained in the November 12 Order. Within seven days of PTAB’s issuance of a final decision, the parties shall file a joint 3 status report detailing the results of the IPR and setting forth the parties’ positions on how this 4 case should move forward. The Court will issue an order addressing further proceedings in the 5 case after receiving the parties’ joint status report. 6 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 1/7/2016 ______________________________________ HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Judge 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?