IXI Mobile (R&D) Ltd. et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
Filing
137
ORDER CONTINUING STAY. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 1/7/2016. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
IXI MOBILE (R&D) LTD., et al.,
Case No. 15-cv-03752-HSG
Plaintiffs,
8
ORDER CONTINUING STAY
v.
9
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD, et
al.,
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
Defendants.
12
IXI MOBILE (R&D) LTD., et al.,
13
14
15
Plaintiffs,
v.
BLACKBERRY LIMITED, et al.,
16
17
Defendants.
IXI MOBILE (R&D) LTD., et al.,
18
19
20
21
Case No. 15-cv-03754-HSG
Case No. 15-cv-03755-HSG
Plaintiffs,
v.
APPLE INC,
Defendant.
22
23
On November 12, 2015, the Court granted Defendants’ motion to stay the above-captioned
24
actions pending decision by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) whether to institute inter
25
partes review (“IPR”) proceedings regarding the patent claims at issue in these lawsuits. Dkt. No.
26
133. The parties submitted a joint status report on January 5, 2016 informing the Court of the
27
PTAB’s decision to institute IPR of 52 of the 53 claims asserted here. Dkt. No. 136. In light of
28
this decision, the Court ORDERS the stay extended until the completion of the IPR process, for
1
2
the reasons explained in the November 12 Order.
Within seven days of PTAB’s issuance of a final decision, the parties shall file a joint
3
status report detailing the results of the IPR and setting forth the parties’ positions on how this
4
case should move forward. The Court will issue an order addressing further proceedings in the
5
case after receiving the parties’ joint status report.
6
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 1/7/2016
______________________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?