Apple, Inc. v. Eon Corp. IP Holdings, LLC

Filing 29

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 05/02/2017. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Michael J. Bettinger, SBN 122196
[e-mail]
Irene Yang, SBN 245464
[e-mail]
Ezekiel L. Rauscher, SBN 269141
[e-mail]
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
555 California Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, California 94104
Ash Nagdev, SBN 259921
[e-mail]
Ryuk Park, SBN 298744
[e-mail]
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
1001 Page Mill Road, Building 1
Palo Alto, California 94304
Attorneys for Defendant Apple Inc.

11
12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

16

APPLE INC.,
Plaintiff,

17
18

vs.

19

EON CORP. IP HOLDINGS, LLC,

20

Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 3:15-cv-03762-WHO
Assigned to: Hon. William H. Orrick
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
OF DISMISSAL

21
22
23
24

On this day, Plaintiff Apple Inc. (“Apple”) and Defendant EON Corp. IP Holdings, LLC
(“EON”), have agreed to dismiss all claims between the parties.
Accordingly, Apple and EON hereby stipulate to dismissal pursuant to the below Order.

25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL
CASE NO. 3:15-CV-03762-WHO

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Dated: April 24, 2017

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
By: /s/ Ezekiel L. Rauscher
Michael J. Bettinger, SBN 122196
[e-mail]
Irene Yang, SBN 245464
[e-mail]
Ezekiel L. Rauscher, SBN 269141
[e-mail]
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
555 California Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, California 94104
Ash Nagdev, SBN 259921
[e-mail]
Ryuk Park, SBN 298744
[e-mail]
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
1001 Page Mill Road, Building 1
Palo Alto, California 94304

8
9
10
11

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
APPLE INC.

12
13
14
15
16
17

By: /s/ Daniel R. Scardino (with permission)
Daniel R. Scardino
[e-mail]
Joshua G. Jones
[e-mail]
REED & SCARDINO LLP
301 Congress Ave Suite 1250
Austin, TX 78701

18
19

MICLEAN GLEASON LLP

20

David J. Miclean, SBN 115098
[e-mail]
Carmen M. Aviles, SBN 251993
[e-mail]

21
22
23

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
EON CORP. IP HOLDINGS, LLC

24
25
26
27
28
2

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

ORDER
On this day, Plaintiff Apple Inc. (“Apple”) and Defendant EON Corp. IP Holdings, LLC
(“EON”) announced to the Court that they have settled their respective claims for relief asserted in
this cause. The Court, having considered this request, is of the opinion that their request for
dismissal should be granted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that all claims for relief asserted against EON by Apple
herein are dismissed with prejudice; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all attorneys’ fees, costs of court and expenses shall be
borne by each party incurring the same.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

11
12

May 2, 2017
Dated: ____________________
THE HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ORRICK
United States District Court Judge

13
14
15
16
17

FILER’S ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer of this document attests that concurrence in
the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory above.

18
19
20
21

Dated: April 24, 2017

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
By: /s/ Ezekiel L. Rauscher
Ezekiel L. Rauscher

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL