Greg Fisher v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 30

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 29 13 MOTION to Compel Arbitration STIPULATION REGARDING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION BRIEFING. Responses due by 11/11/2015. Replies due by 11/23/2015. Motion Hearing reset for 12/10/2015 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Edward M. Chen. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/30/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/30/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
THEODORE J. BOUTROUS, JR., SBN 132099
[e-mail]
THEANE D. EVANGELIS, SBN 243570
[e-mail]
333 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 213.229.7520
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
JOSHUA S. LIPSHUTZ, SBN 242557
[e-mail]
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, CA 94105-0921
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.393.8306

CHRISTOPHER J. HAMNER (SBN 197117)
[e-mail]
AMY T. WOOTTON (SBN 188856)
[e-mail]
EVELINA SERAFINI (SBN 187137)
[e-mail]
HAMNER LAW OFFICES, APC
555 W. 5th Street, 31st Floor
Los Angeles, California 90013
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
GREG FISHER

Attorneys for Defendants
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and
RASIER-CA LLC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15
16
17

GREG FISHER, on behalf of himself and
the proposed collective class,

18
19
20
21

Plaintiffs,

CASE NO. 3:15-cv-03774-EMC
STIPULATION REGARDING MOTION TO
COMPEL ARBITRATION BRIEFING

v.
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a
Delaware corporation, RASIER-CA LLC,
a Delaware Limited Liability Company,
and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,

22
Defendants.
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 3:15-cv-03774-EMC
STIPULATION REGARDING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION BRIEFING

1

Pursuant to Rule 6-1(b) of the Local Rules of the United States District for the Northern
(“Plaintiff”),

2

District

3

TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and RASIER-CA, LLC (“Defendants”) (collectively, “the Parties”),

4

through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that the deadline for Plaintiff’s

5

Response to Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration be extended from October 28, 2015 to

6

November 11, 2015 and the deadline for Defendants’ Reply extended from November 4 to

7

November 23 in order to provide Plaintiffs adequate time to prepare a Response to Defendants’

8

Motion to Compel Arbitration and to provide Defendants with adequate time to prepare a Reply in

9

support of Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration.

of

California,

Plaintiff

GREG

FISHER

and

Defendants

UBER

10

There has been no previous request to extend the timing for the deadlines associated with

11

Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration. This stipulation will not require the alteration of the

12

hearing date already set by Court Order.

13
14

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

15
16

Dated: October 30, 2015

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

17
By:

18

Joshua S. Lipshutz

19

Attorneys for Defendants UBER
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and RASIER-CA LLC

20
21
22

Dated: October 30, 2015

HAMNER LAW OFFICES, APC
By:

/s/
Christopher J. Hamner

23
24

/s/

Attorneys for Plaintiff GREG FISHER

25
26
27
28

Case No. 3:15-cv-03667-EMC
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING

1.

1
2
3

ATTORNEY ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1, I, Christopher J. Hamner hereby attest that concurrence in
the filing of this document has been obtained from Joshua S. Lipshutz.

4
5

DATED: October 29, 2015

HAMNER LAW OFFICES, APC

6
By:

7
8

/s/
Christopher J. Hamner

Attorneys for Plaintiff GREG FISHER

9
10
11
12

RT

20

J

ER

H

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2.

R NIA

. Chen

ward M
udge Ed

NO

19

FO

18

DERED

O OR
IT IS S

LI

17

E
TC
______________________________________
AT
T
HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

RT
U
O

16

S DISTRIC

10/30/15

Date: ________________________________

A

15

The hearing on the motion to compel is rescheduled from 12/7/15 to
12/10/15 at 1:30 p.m.

S

14

IT IS SO ORDERED.

UNIT
ED

13

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C