Wishnev v. The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company

Filing 77

STIPULATION AND ORDER resetting CMC. Case Management Statement due by 9/20/2018. Further Case Management Conference set for 9/27/2018 10:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/14/18. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 MICHAEL J. STORTZ (SBN 139386) michael.stortz@dbr.com MARSHALL L. BAKER (SBN 300987) marshall.baker@dbr.com DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP 50 Fremont Street, 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-2235 Telephone: (415) 591-7500 Facsimile: (415) 591-7510 STEPHEN C. BAKER (pro hac vice) stephen.baker@dbr.com TIMOTHY J. O’DRISCOLL (pro hac vice) timothy.odriscoll@dbr.com DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP One Logan Square, Ste. 2000 Philadelphia, PA 19103-6996 Telephone: (215) 988-2700 Facsimile: (215) 988-2757 Attorneys for Defendant THE NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 16 17 18 SANFORD J. WISHNEV, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 19 Plaintiff, 20 21 22 23 v. Case No. 3:15-CV-03797-EMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE STAY AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; DECLARATION OF MICHAEL J. STORTZ IN SUPPORT THE NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Wisconsin corporation, and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants. 24 25 26 27 28 DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE STAY AND CMC; STORTZ DECL. CASE NO. 3:15-CV-03797-EMC 1 WHEREAS, on June 9, 2016, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals granted Defendant The 2 Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company’s (“Northwestern Mutual”) petition to appeal this 3 Court’s Order denying Northwestern Mutual’s motion to dismiss; 4 WHEREAS, this action has been stayed since June 30, 2016, when this Court issued an 5 order (Dkt. No. 69) staying the action “pending completion of the appellate review or further 6 order”; 7 8 9 WHEREAS, appellate briefing in Northwestern Mutual’s appeal has been complete since January 27, 2017, and oral argument took place on October 16, 2017; WHEREAS, in addition to Northwestern Mutual’s appeal, there are two other appeals 10 presenting the same issues pending in the Ninth Circuit: Martin v. Metro. Life Ins. Co., No. 16- 11 15690 (9th Cir. Apr. 15, 2016) and Lujan v. New York Life Ins. Co., No. 16-16401 (9th Cir. Aug. 12 9, 2016); 13 14 15 WHEREAS, appellate briefing in Martin and Lujan is also complete, and oral argument in those cases also took place on October 16, 2017; WHEREAS, on January 18, 2018, the Ninth Circuit issued an Order asking the California 16 Supreme Court to resolve two questions of California law presented in the pending appeals; 17 WHEREAS, the California Supreme Court (Case No. S246541) has not yet decided 18 whether to grant or deny the Ninth Circuit’s request; 19 WHEREAS, if the California Supreme Court grants the Ninth Circuit’s request, the 20 California Supreme Court may order further briefing and oral argument before issuing its decision 21 on the two certified questions; 22 23 WHEREAS, if the California Supreme Court denies the Ninth Circuit’s request, the Ninth Circuit will issue its decision in the pending appeals; 24 WHEREAS, while Northwestern Mutual’s appeal has been pending, this Court has twice 25 issued Orders continuing the Case Management Conference (“CMC”) and continuing the stay of 26 this action; 27 WHEREAS, specifically, on March 10, 2017, this Court issued an Order (Dkt. No. 73) 28 continuing the next CMC to September 28, 2017 and continuing the stay through that date “or DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE STAY AND CMC; STORTZ DECL. -2- CASE NO. 3:15-CV-03797-EMC 1 2 3 4 pending further Order of the Court”; WHEREAS, on September 19, 2017, this Court issued an Order (Dkt. No. 75) continuing both the CMC and the stay to March 29, 2018 “or pending further Order of the Court”; WHEREAS, the Parties through counsel have met and conferred and agree that given the 5 status of Northwestern Mutual’s appeal, and the Martin and Lujan appeals, as well as the status of 6 proceedings before the California Supreme Court, (1) the existing stay in this action should 7 continue for six more months, unless earlier terminated by the Court upon request of one or both 8 of the parties; and (2) the March 29, 2018 CMC should be continued for six months, unless earlier 9 scheduled by the Court; 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 WHEREAS, the requested continuance will not impact any other deadlines already set by the Court. THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties through their respective counsel as follows: 1. This action should remain stayed through September 27, 2018 or pending further Order of the Court; and 2. The Case Management Conference currently scheduled for March 29, 2018 should be continued to September 27, 2018 at 10:30 a.m., or such other date as the Court deems proper. 3. The parties shall file a Case Management Statement on or before September 20, 19 2018 or as hereafter ordered by the Court. 20 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 21 22 Dated: March 9, 2018 DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP 23 24 By: /s/ Michael J. Stortz Michael J. Stortz Marshall L. Baker 25 26 Attorneys for Defendant THE NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 27 28 DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE STAY AND CMC; STORTZ DECL. -3- CASE NO. 3:15-CV-03797-EMC 1 Dated: March 9, 2018 BRAMSON, PLUTZIK, MAHLER & BIRKHAEUSER, LLP 2 3 By: /s/ Robert M. Bramson Robert M. Bramson 4 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff SANFORD J. WISHNEV 6 Attestation Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i) 7 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i), I, Michael J. Stortz, hereby attest that I have obtained 8 9 concurrence in the filing of this document from the other signatory to this document. 10 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 11 foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 9th day of March, 2018 in San Francisco, California. 12 13 /s/ Michael J. Stortz Michael J. Stortz 14 15 [PROPOSED] ORDER 16 Pursuant to Stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 18 S 21 ERED O ORD IT IS S R NIA 3/14/18 Date: UNIT ED Hon. Edward M. Chen UNITED STATES DISTRICT en JUDGE M. Ch dward Judge E H ER LI RT 23 FO NO 22 24 25 A 20 RT U O 19 S DISTRICT TE C TA N F D IS T IC T O R C 26 27 28 DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE STAY AND CMC; STORTZ DECL. -4- CASE NO. 3:15-CV-03797-EMC DECLARATION OF MICHAEL J. STORTZ 1 2 I, Michael J. Stortz, declare as follows: 3 1. I am an active member in good standing of the Bar of the State of California, 4 admitted to practice before this Court, and a partner with the firm of Drinker Biddle & Reath 5 LLP, attorneys of record for Defendant The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company 6 (“Northwestern Mutual”) in the above-entitled action. I make this Declaration in support of the 7 parties’ Stipulation to Continue Stay and Case Management Conference. If called, I could and 8 would testify to the matters set forth herein. 9 2. This action has been stayed since June 30, 2016. Since that time, Northwestern 10 Mutual has pursued an appeal in the Ninth Circuit as to this Court’s interlocutory Order denying 11 Northwestern Mutual’s motion to dismiss. 12 3. In Northwestern Mutual’s appeal, the parties have filed their respective briefs, and 13 appellate briefing has been complete since January 27, 2017. Oral argument took place on 14 October 16, 2017. 15 4. In addition to Northwestern Mutual’s appeal, there are two other appeals 16 presenting the same issues pending in the Ninth Circuit: Martin v. Metro. Life Ins. Co., No. 16- 17 15690 (9th Cir. Apr. 15, 2016) and Lujan v. New York Life Ins. Co., No. 16-16401 (9th Cir. Aug. 18 9, 2016). 19 5. 20 21 The appellate briefing in Martin and Lujan is also complete, and oral argument in those cases took place on October 16, 2017. 6. On January 18, 2018, the Ninth Circuit issued an Order asking the California 22 Supreme Court to resolve two questions of California law presented in the pending appeals. The 23 California Supreme Court (Case No. S246541) has not yet decided whether to grant or deny the 24 Ninth Circuit’s request. 25 7. On March 10, 2017, and again on September 19, 2017, this Court issued Orders 26 that continued both the stay and the date for the CMC by six months. A CMC is currently 27 scheduled for March 29, 2018. 28 DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE STAY AND CMC; STORTZ DECL. -5- CASE NO. 3:15-CV-03797-EMC 1 8. There is good cause to continue the stay for an additional six months, and to 2 continue the March 29, 2018 CMC to September 27, 2018, as Northwestern Mutual’s appeal, 3 Martin, and Lujan each present the same threshold questions of law, the resolution of which may 4 obviate the need for any further proceedings in this Court. 5 9. The requested continuance will not impact any deadlines already set by the Court. 6 10. To date, the other time modifications in this case are as follows: on August 31, 7 2015, the Court approved the Parties’ Stipulation As to Filing of the Amended Complaint; on 8 November 5, 2015, the Court reset the hearing on Northwestern Mutual’s Motion to Dismiss 9 Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint and reset the CMC to November 20, 2015; on November 20, 10 2015, the Court again reset the CMC to January 21, 2016; on January 12, 2016, the Court again 11 reset the CMC to March 3, 2016; on February 23, 2016, the Court granted Northwestern Mutual’s 12 Motion to Continue the CMC to March 24, 2016; on May 31, 2016, the Court approved the 13 Parties’ stipulated request to continue the CMC to June 30, 2016; on March 2, 2017, the Court 14 rescheduled the March 30, 2017 CMC for March 28, 2017; on March 10, 2017, the Court 15 continued the CMC to September 28, 2017; and on September 19, 2017, the Court continued the 16 CMC to March 29, 2018. 17 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 18 foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 9th day of March, 2018 at San Francisco, California. 19 20 /s/ Michael J. Stortz Michael J. Stortz 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE STAY AND CMC; STORTZ DECL. -6- CASE NO. 3:15-CV-03797-EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?