Ed Daie v. Aetna Life Insurance Company, et al

Filing 20

ORDER RE STIPULATION CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS MOTIONS TO DISMISS by Judge Alsup granting 18 Stipulation (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

ED DAIE,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13

Plaintiff,
v.
THE REED GROUP, et al.,
Defendants.
/

14
15

No. C 15-03813 WHA

ORDER RE STIPULATION
CONTINUING HEARING
ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS
TO DISMISS

Pursuant to the order reassigning this matter, all scheduled dates were vacated and

16

motions were required to be renoticed for hearing, although briefing schedules remained

17

unchanged (Dkt. No. 15). At the time of the reassignment, there were two motions to dismiss

18

pending, scheduled for hearing on October 2. Plaintiff’s responses to those motions are due on

19

September 10. Although defendants have not renoticed their motions, the parties filed a

20

stipulation requesting a continuance of the hearing and an extension on the briefing schedule for

21

the motions to dismiss. This order treats the stipulation as a renotice of the motion, although

22

defendants should lodge chambers copies of all documents pertaining to this motion. Good

23

cause shown, plaintiff’s responses shall be due on OCTOBER 1 and defendants’ replies shall be

24

due on OCTOBER 8. The motion shall be heard on OCTOBER 29 AT 8:00 A.M.

25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.

27
28

Dated: September 9, 2015.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE