Autodesk, Inc. v. Kobayashi + Zedda Architects LTD.
Filing
14
ORDER GRANTING: 13 Second MOTION to Continue Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines. Case Management Statement due by 3/17/2016. Case Management Conference set for 3/24/2016 10:00 AM. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 2/9/2016. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
JULIE E. HOFER, #152185
julie@donahue.com
ANDREW S. MACKAY, #197074
andrew@donahue.com
DONAHUE FITZGERALD LLP
1999 Harrison Street, Floor 25
Oakland, California 94612
Telephone:
(510) 451-0544
Facsimile:
(510) 832-1486
Attorneys for Plaintiff
AUTODESK, INC.
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
13
AUTODESK, INC., a Delaware
corporation,
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
17
18
v.
KOBAYASHI + ZEDDA ARCHITECTS
LTD., dba KZA, a Canadian company,
Defendant.
CASE NO. 15-CV-03822MEJ
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
AUTODESK'S MOTION TO CONTINUE
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
AND RELATED CASE MANAGEMENT
AND ADR DEADLINES
CMC Date:
Proposed CMC Date:
Time:
Dept.:
Judge:
February 18, 2016
March 24, 2016
10:00 a.m.
Ctrm B, 15th Floor
Hon. Maria Elena James
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMIN. MOTION TO CONTINUE CMC
CASE NO. CV 15-03822 MEJ
1
This matter having come before the Court on Plaintiff Autodesk, Inc.’s Administrative
2
Motion to Continue the Case Management Conference, supported by the Declaration of Julie E.
3
Hofer, and based thereon,
4
5
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case Management Conference, currently set for
February 18, 2016 is continued to March 24, 2016. All related deadlines are moved accordingly.
6
7
8
Dated: February 9, 2016
Hon. Maria Elena James
United States District Court Magistrate Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMIN. MOTION TO CONTINUE CMC
CASE NO. CV 15-03822 MEJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?