Autodesk, Inc. v. Kobayashi + Zedda Architects LTD.

Filing 14

ORDER GRANTING: 13 Second MOTION to Continue Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines. Case Management Statement due by 3/17/2016. Case Management Conference set for 3/24/2016 10:00 AM. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 2/9/2016. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 JULIE E. HOFER, #152185 julie@donahue.com ANDREW S. MACKAY, #197074 andrew@donahue.com DONAHUE FITZGERALD LLP 1999 Harrison Street, Floor 25 Oakland, California 94612 Telephone: (510) 451-0544 Facsimile: (510) 832-1486 Attorneys for Plaintiff AUTODESK, INC. 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 13 AUTODESK, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, 14 15 16 17 18 v. KOBAYASHI + ZEDDA ARCHITECTS LTD., dba KZA, a Canadian company, Defendant. CASE NO. 15-CV-03822MEJ [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING AUTODESK'S MOTION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED CASE MANAGEMENT AND ADR DEADLINES CMC Date: Proposed CMC Date: Time: Dept.: Judge: February 18, 2016 March 24, 2016 10:00 a.m. Ctrm B, 15th Floor Hon. Maria Elena James 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMIN. MOTION TO CONTINUE CMC CASE NO. CV 15-03822 MEJ 1 This matter having come before the Court on Plaintiff Autodesk, Inc.’s Administrative 2 Motion to Continue the Case Management Conference, supported by the Declaration of Julie E. 3 Hofer, and based thereon, 4 5 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case Management Conference, currently set for February 18, 2016 is continued to March 24, 2016. All related deadlines are moved accordingly. 6 7 8 Dated: February 9, 2016 Hon. Maria Elena James United States District Court Magistrate Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMIN. MOTION TO CONTINUE CMC CASE NO. CV 15-03822 MEJ

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?