Autodesk, Inc. v. Kobayashi + Zedda Architects LTD.

Filing 43

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting 42 Stipulation for Dismissal. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6

JULIE E. HOFER, #152185
[e-mail]
ANDREWS. MACKAY, #197074
[e-mail]
DONAHUE FITZGERALD LLP
1999 Harrison Street, 25th floor
Oakland, California 94612-3520
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
AUfODESK, INC

7

8
UNITED STATES DISTRICf COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICf OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11

12
13
14
15
16

Case No. 3:15-cv-30822-MEJ

AUfODESK, INC., a Delaware
corporation,

STIPULATION; ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff,
v.
KOBAYASHI+ ZEDDA ARCHITECfS
LTD., dba KZA, a Canadian company,

17
Defendant.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION; ORDER OF DISMISSAL

CASE NO. 3: 1~·90822 ·
MEJ

1
2

Plaintiff Autodesk, Inc. ("Autodesk"), by and through its counsel, and defendant
Kobayashi + Zedda Architects Ltd., dba KZA ("KZA") hereby stipulate to the following:

3

1.

KZA's officers, directors, principals, agents, employees, successors, and assigns,

4

and all other persons acting in concert with or in conspiracy with or affiliated with KZA are

5

enjoined and restrained from:

6
7

(a)

Copying, reproducing, distributing or using any unauthorized copies of

Autodesk's copyrighted software products;

8

(b)

Otherwise infringing any of Autodesk's copyrights and trademarks; and

9

(c)

Circumventing any technological measure that effectively controls access

10

to any of Autodesk's software products.

2.

11

Pursuant to a settlement agreement entered into between the parties to this action,

12

without either party admitting to liability or wrongdoing, the remaining claims for relief in this

13

action have been settled with certain additional obligations to be performed by the parties. The

14

remaining action is hereby dismissed with prejudice. Each party will bear its own fees and costs,

15

except as may otherwise be authorized by the parties' settlement agreement.

16
17

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

s;f·r"~o

Dated: ~JL, 2016

DONAHUE FITZGERALD LLP

18

19

Hofer
ys for Plaintiff AUTO

20
21

Dated:

August~, 2016

22
23
24

Dated: September 13, 2016

S

ERED

O ORD
IT IS S

s
na Jame

ria-Ele
dge Ma

NO

STIPULATION; ORDER OF DISMISSAL

RT

Ju

H

ER

CASE NO. 3:15-cv-30822·
IAEJ

FO

-1-

R NIA

Judge of the United States District Court

LI

28

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

A

27

UNIT
ED

26

ORDER

RT
U
O

25

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C