Hello Network, Inc. v. Hello and Hola Media, Inc. et al

Filing 34

SCHEDULING ORDER. Deadline to add parties or amend the pleadings 2/1/2016. Fact discovery cut-off 5/31/2016. Expert disclosures 6/30/2016. Expert rebuttal 7/29/2016. Expert discovery cut-off 8/19/2016. Deadline to file dispositive and Daub ert motions 10/6/2016. Oppositions to dispositive and Daubert motions 11/3/2016. Reply briefs in support of dispositive and Daubert motions 11/17/2016. Hearing date on dispositive and Daubert motions 12/1/2016. Pretrial conferen ce statement due 1/3/2017. Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/13/2017 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 4th Floor, Oakland. Jury Trial set for 2/6/2017 - 2/67/2017 at 8:30 AM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jon S. Tigar. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on December 21, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2015)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

HELLO NETWORK, INC.,

Case No. 15-cv-03838-JST

Plaintiff,
9
v.

SCHEDULING ORDER

10
11

HELLO AND HOLA MEDIA, INC., et al.,

United States District Court
Northern District of California

Defendants.
12
13
14
15

The Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10:

16
Event

Deadline

17
Deadline to add parties or amend the pleadings

February 1, 2016

Fact discovery cut-off

May 31, 2016

20

Expert disclosures

June 30, 2016

21

Expert rebuttal

July 29, 2016

22

Expert discovery cut-off

August 19, 2016

Deadline to file dispositive and Daubert motions

October 6, 2016

Oppositions to dispositive and Daubert motions

November 3, 2016

Reply briefs in support of dispositive and Daubert motions

November 17, 2016

Hearing date on dispositive and Daubert motions

December 1, 2016

Pretrial conference statement due

January 3, 2017

18
19

23
24
25
26
27
28

Event

1
2

Deadline

Pretrial conference

January 13, 2017 at
2:00 p.m.

Trial

February 6, 2017 at
8:30 a.m.

Estimate of trial length (in days)

Eight

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

The Court will refer the case to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Corley for settlement by
separate order.
Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with
the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.
The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire
counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely
manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their
calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can.
For the most part, the parties proposed these dates, and they should assume that the Court
will enforce them. Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for
continuance are disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a
party, party-controlled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good
cause to grant a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions
as good cause to grant a continuance.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 21, 2015
_______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge

25
26
27
28
2