Collaborative Agreements, LLC v. Adobe Systems Incorporated et al

Filing 144

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 143 Unopposed Motion to Withdraw Edward Chin as Counsel for Collaborative Agreements, LLC filed by Collaborative Agreements, LLC. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/16/16. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/15/2016)

Download PDF
1 8 NIX, PATTERSON & ROACH, L.L.P. DEREK T. GILLILAND (pro hac vice) dgilliland@nixlawfirm.com EDWARD CHIN (pro hac vice) edchin@me.com CHRISTIAN HURT (pro hac vice) christianhurt@nixlawfirm.com KIRK VOSS (pro hac vice) kirkvoss@me.com 5215 N. O’Connor Blvd., Suite 1900 Irving, Texas 75039 Telephone: (972) 831-1188 Facsimile: (972) 444-0716 9 – and – 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 12 13 14 15 Lewis E. Hudnell, III (CASBN 218736) HUDNELL LAW GROUP P.C. 800 W. El Camino Real Suite 180 Mountain View, California 94040 Telephone: 650.564.7720 Facsimile: 347.772.3034 Email: lewis@hudnelllaw.com ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF COLLABORATIVE AGREEMENTS, LLC 16 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 20 21 COLLABORATIVE AGREEMENTS, LLC, D/B/A OUI AGREE 22 23 24 25 26 Plaintiff, v. ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED, et al, Defendants. 27 28 Unopposed Motion to Withdraw Edward Chin Case No: 3:15-CV-03853-EMC Case No: 3:15-cv-03853-EMC UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR WITHDRAW EDWARD CHIN AS COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Judge: The Honorable Edward Chen 1 Pursuant to Local Rule CV 11-5(a), Nix Patterson & Roach, LLP respectfully requests 2 that Edward Chin be permitted to withdraw as counsel for Plaintiff Collaborative Agreements, 3 4 5 6 LLC. Mr. Chin will no longer be employed by Nix Patterson & Roach after January 15, 2016. Additionally, Collaborative Agreements, LLC and Nix, Patterson & Roach request that Mr. Chin’s electronic notices in this case be terminated effective upon entry of the Order 7 withdrawing him as attorney-of-record in this case. The remaining undersigned members of Nix 8 Patterson & Roach and Hudnell Law Group, P.C. will continue to represent Collaborative 9 Agreements, LLC in this matter. 10 11 Counsel for Collaborative Agreements, LLC has conferred with counsel for defendant, and the motion is unopposed. 12 13 Dated: January 14, 2016 Respectfully submitted, 14 15 __________________________________ Edward Chin 16 17 24 NIX, PATTERSON & ROACH, L.L.P. DEREK T. GILLILAND (pro hac vice) dgilliland@nixlawfirm.com EDWARD CHIN (pro hac vice) edchin@me.com CHRISTIAN HURT (pro hac vice) christianhurt@nixlawfirm.com KIRK VOSS (pro hac vice) kirkvoss@me.com 5215 N. O’Connor Blvd., Suite 1900 Irving, TX 75039 Telephone: (972) 831-1188 Facsimile: (972) 444-0716 25 – and – 26 Lewis E. Hudnell, III (CASBN 218736) HUDNELL LAW GROUP P.C. 800 W. El Camino Real Suite 180 Mountain View, California 94040 18 19 20 21 22 23 27 28 Unopposed Motion to Withdraw Edward Chin Case No: 3:15-CV-03853-EMC 1 Telephone: 650.564.7720 Facsimile: 347.772.3034 Email: lewis@hudnelllaw.com 2 3 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF COLLABORATIVE AGREEMENTS, LLC 4 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 6 7 8 The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing document was electronically filed in compliance with Local Rule CV-5 and served via the Court’s electronic filing system on all counsel who have consented to electronic service on January 14, 2016. 9 10 11 __________________________________ Edward Chin 12 13 NIX, PATTERSON & ROACH, L.L.P. 14 15 16 The  Motion  to  Withdraw  Edward  Chin  as  Counsel  for  Collaborative  Agreements,  LLC   is  hereby  GRANTED.   22     UNIT ED 21 1/15 23 ER H 26 __________________________ Honorable Edward Chen n Che United States ward M. Court Judge EdDistrict Judge RT 25 NO 24 D RDERE OO IT IS S FO Dated:  ____________________,  2016   S 20 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 19 R NIA   LI 18 27 28 Unopposed Motion to Withdraw Edward Chin Case No: 3:15-CV-03853-EMC A 17 ORDER N F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?