Wilson v. Georgia-Pacific LLC

Filing 29

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting 28 Motion Extending Scheduled Settlement Conference. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 LEGAL AID OF MARIN DAVID LEVIN (State Bar No. 193801) ANN MUNENE (State Bar No. 301287) 30 North San Pedro Road, Suite 220 San Rafael, California 94903 Telephone: (415) 492-0230 Facsimile: (415) 492-0947 DUCKWORTH PETERS LEBOWITZ OLIVIER LLP MARK PETERS (State Bar No. 160611) 100 Bush Street, Suite 1800 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 433-0333 Facsimile: (415) 449-6556 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Attorneys for Plaintiff FURGUS WILSON KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP SUSAN W. PANGBORN (State Bar No. 282533) SPangborn@kilpatricktownsend.com KENDRA C. CHAPMAN (State Bar No. 294030) KChapman@kilpatricktownsend.com Eighth Floor, Two Embarcadero Center San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 576-0200 Facsimile: (415) 576-0300 Attorneys for Defendants GEORGIA-PACIFIC LLC and GEORGIA-PACIFIC GYPSUM LLC 17 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 20 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 21 FURGUS WILSON, Plaintiff, 22 23 24 25 Case No. 3:15-cv-03878-JD (MEJ) v. GEORGIA-PACIFIC LLC, a Delaware corporation; GEORGIA-PACIFIC GYPSUM LLC, a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 26 Defendants. JOINT MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING SCHEDULED SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE Honorable Maria-Elena James Complaint Filed: August 25, 2015 Trial Date: December 5, 2016 27 28 JOINT MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING SCHEDULED SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE – Case No. 3:15-cv-03878-JD (MEJ) 1 Plaintiff Furgus Wilson and Defendants Georgia-Pacific LLC and Georgia-Pacific Gypsum 2 LLC (hereinafter “the Parties”), through their respective counsel, hereby move the Court for an 3 order extending the date for the scheduled settlement conference set forth in the Court’s 4 December 30, 2015, Order Scheduling Settlement Conference (Docket No. 27) by at least sixty 5 (60) days, to on or after April 30, 2016, on the following grounds: 6 7 8 9 10 Plaintiff’s attorney, Mr. Mark Peters, is currently scheduled to be in trial for another matter on March 1, 2016. WHEREFORE, the parties request that the date for the scheduled settlement conference set by the Court in the December 30, 2015, Order Scheduling Settlement Conference be extended by at least sixty (60) days to on or after April 30, 2016. 11 12 Dated: January 22, 2016 13 Respectfully submitted, KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP 14 15 By: 16 /s/ Susan W. Pangborn Susan W. Pangborn Attorneys for Defendants GEORGIA-PACIFIC LLC and GEORGIA-PACIFIC GYPSUM LLC 17 18 19 20 21 Dated: January 22, 2016 DUCKWORTH PETERS LEBOWITZ OLIVIER LLP 22 23 24 25 By: /s/ Mark Peters Mark Peters Attorneys for Plaintiff FURGUS WILSON 26 27 28 JOINT MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING SCHEDULED SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE – Case No. 3:15-cv-03878-JD (MEJ) -1- ATTESTATION REGARDING SIGNATURE 1 2 Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i) (3) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury 3 that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory. 4 Dated: January 22, 2016 /s/ Susan W. Pangborn Susan W. Pangborn 5 6 7 8 [PROPOSED] ORDER 9 10 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the date scheduled for the Settlement Conference in 11 May 10, 2016 @ 10:00 a.m. the above-captioned case is continued from March 1, 2016, to __________________________. 12 13 Settlement Conference Statements shall be lodged, with Chambers, by May 7, 2016. The Court's previous Settlement Conference Order otherwise remains in full force and effect. 1/26/2016 Date: _____________________ 14 15 Maria Elena-James United States Magistrate Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 8070292V.4 JOINT MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING SCHEDULED SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE – Case No. 3:15-cv-03878-JD (MEJ) -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?