Wilson v. Georgia-Pacific LLC
Filing
29
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting 28 Motion Extending Scheduled Settlement Conference. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
LEGAL AID OF MARIN
DAVID LEVIN (State Bar No. 193801)
ANN MUNENE (State Bar No. 301287)
30 North San Pedro Road, Suite 220
San Rafael, California 94903
Telephone: (415) 492-0230
Facsimile: (415) 492-0947
DUCKWORTH PETERS LEBOWITZ OLIVIER LLP
MARK PETERS (State Bar No. 160611)
100 Bush Street, Suite 1800
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: (415) 433-0333
Facsimile: (415) 449-6556
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Attorneys for Plaintiff
FURGUS WILSON
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
SUSAN W. PANGBORN (State Bar No. 282533)
SPangborn@kilpatricktownsend.com
KENDRA C. CHAPMAN (State Bar No. 294030)
KChapman@kilpatricktownsend.com
Eighth Floor, Two Embarcadero Center
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 576-0200
Facsimile: (415) 576-0300
Attorneys for Defendants
GEORGIA-PACIFIC LLC and
GEORGIA-PACIFIC GYPSUM LLC
17
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
19
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
20
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
21
FURGUS WILSON,
Plaintiff,
22
23
24
25
Case No. 3:15-cv-03878-JD (MEJ)
v.
GEORGIA-PACIFIC LLC, a Delaware
corporation; GEORGIA-PACIFIC GYPSUM
LLC, a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1
through 50, inclusive,
26
Defendants.
JOINT MOTION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING SCHEDULED
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
Honorable Maria-Elena James
Complaint Filed: August 25, 2015
Trial Date:
December 5, 2016
27
28
JOINT MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING SCHEDULED
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE – Case No. 3:15-cv-03878-JD (MEJ)
1
Plaintiff Furgus Wilson and Defendants Georgia-Pacific LLC and Georgia-Pacific Gypsum
2
LLC (hereinafter “the Parties”), through their respective counsel, hereby move the Court for an
3
order extending the date for the scheduled settlement conference set forth in the Court’s
4
December 30, 2015, Order Scheduling Settlement Conference (Docket No. 27) by at least sixty
5
(60) days, to on or after April 30, 2016, on the following grounds:
6
7
8
9
10
Plaintiff’s attorney, Mr. Mark Peters, is currently scheduled to be in trial for another matter
on March 1, 2016.
WHEREFORE, the parties request that the date for the scheduled settlement conference set
by the Court in the December 30, 2015, Order Scheduling Settlement Conference be extended by
at least sixty (60) days to on or after April 30, 2016.
11
12
Dated: January 22, 2016
13
Respectfully submitted,
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
14
15
By:
16
/s/ Susan W. Pangborn
Susan W. Pangborn
Attorneys for Defendants
GEORGIA-PACIFIC LLC and
GEORGIA-PACIFIC GYPSUM LLC
17
18
19
20
21
Dated: January 22, 2016
DUCKWORTH PETERS LEBOWITZ
OLIVIER LLP
22
23
24
25
By:
/s/ Mark Peters
Mark Peters
Attorneys for Plaintiff
FURGUS WILSON
26
27
28
JOINT MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING SCHEDULED
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE – Case No. 3:15-cv-03878-JD (MEJ)
-1-
ATTESTATION REGARDING SIGNATURE
1
2
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i) (3) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury
3
that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory.
4
Dated: January 22, 2016
/s/ Susan W. Pangborn
Susan W. Pangborn
5
6
7
8
[PROPOSED] ORDER
9
10
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the date scheduled for the Settlement Conference in
11
May 10, 2016 @ 10:00 a.m.
the above-captioned case is continued from March 1, 2016, to __________________________.
12
13
Settlement Conference Statements shall be lodged, with Chambers, by May 7, 2016.
The Court's previous Settlement Conference Order otherwise remains in full force
and effect.
1/26/2016
Date: _____________________
14
15
Maria Elena-James
United States Magistrate Judge
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
8070292V.4
JOINT MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING SCHEDULED
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE – Case No. 3:15-cv-03878-JD (MEJ)
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?