Perez v. Monster Inc. et al

Filing 25

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 24 Setting Briefing Schedule on Defendants Motion to Dismiss 22 . Responses due by 11/20/2015. Replies due by 12/11/2015. Motion Hearing set for 1/14/2016 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Edward M. Chen. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/3/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 BURSOR & FISHER, P.A. L. Timothy Fisher (State Bar No. 191626) Julia A. Luster (State Bar No. 295031) 1990 North California Boulevard, Suite 940 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Telephone: (925) 300-4455 Facsimile: (925) 407-2700 E-Mail: ltfisher@bursor.com jluster@bursor.com 10 BURSOR & FISHER, P.A. Scott A. Bursor (State Bar No. 276006) Joshua D. Arisohn (Pro Hac Vice) 888 Seventh Avenue New York, NY 10019 Telephone: (212) 989-9113 Facsimile: (212) 989-9163 E-Mail: scott@bursor.com jarisohn@bursor.com 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff 7 8 9 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 16 BENJAMIN PEREZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, 17 18 19 20 v. Case No. 3:15-cv-03885-EMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS MONSTER INC. and BEST BUY CO., INC., Honorable Edward M. Chen Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS CASE NO. 3:15-CV-03885-EMC 1 Plaintiff Benjamin Perez (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Monster Inc. and Best Buy Co., Inc., 2 (“Defendants”) by and through their respective counsel of record, enter into the following 3 stipulation. 4 In light of the Thanksgiving holiday and counsel’s vacation schedules, the parties stipulate 5 that the briefing on Defendants’ motion to dismiss, filed October 30, 2015, shall proceed as 6 follows, subject to the Court’s approval: 7 1. Plaintiff’s opposition shall be filed on November 20, 2015. 8 2. Defendants’ reply shall be filed on December 11, 2015. 9 3. The noted hearing date of December 17, 2015 at 1:30 p.m., in Courtroom 5, 450 10 11 12 Golden Gate Avenue, 17th Floor, San Francisco CA, 94102 will not change. is reset for January 14, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: November 3, 2015 13 BURSOR & FISHER, P.A. By: 14 /s/ L. Timothy Fisher L. Timothy Fisher L. Timothy Fisher (State Bar No. 191626) 1990 North California Boulevard, Suite 940 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Telephone: (925) 300-4455 E-Mail: ltfisher@bursor.com 15 16 17 BURSOR & FISHER, P.A. Scott A. Bursor (State Bar No. 276006) Joshua D. Arisohn (Pro Hac Vice) 888 Seventh Avenue New York, NY 10019 Telephone: (212) 989-9113 E-Mail: scott@bursor.com jarisohn@bursor.com 18 19 20 21 22 Attorneys for Plaintiff 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: November 3, 2015 SACKS, RICKETTS & CASE LLP By: /s/ Michele Floyd Luanne Sacks Michele Floyd 177 Post Street, Suite 650 San Francisco, CA 94108 Facsimile: (415) 549-0580 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS CASE NO. 3:15-CV-03885-EMC 1 Email: lsacks@srclaw.com mfloyd@srclaw.com 1 2 Attorneys for Defendants MONSTER INC. and BEST BUY CO., INC. 3 4 5 ATTESTATION 6 7 8 9 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1, I, L. Timothy Fisher, attest that all signatories listed, and on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the stipulation’s content and have authorized the stipulation. 10 /s/ L. Timothy Fisher L. Timothy Fisher 11 12 [PROPOSED] ORDER 13 22 ER R NIA n M. Che FO dward Judge E H 21 RT 20 NO 19 RDER IS SO O FIED IT DI AS MO LI 18 The Honorable Edward M. Chen United States District Judge ED A 17 Dated: ____________________, 2015 S DISTRICT TE C _____________________________________ TA RT U O 16 11/3 (modified on p. 1 line 10) S 15 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. UNIT ED 14 N F D IS T IC T O R C 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS CASE NO. 3:15-CV-03885-EMC 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?