Perez v. Monster Inc. et al

Filing 44

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 39 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 35 Amended Complaint EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Bestbuy.com LLC, Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy Stores, LP, Monster Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/6/16. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2016)

5

LUANNE SACKS (State Bar No. 120811)
MICHELE FLOYD (State Bar No. 163031)
SACKS, RICKETTS & CASE LLP
177 Post Street, Suite 650
San Francisco, CA 94108
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415-549-0640
E-Mail: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

6

Attorneys for Defendants Monster Inc.,
Best Buy Stores, LP, and Bestbuy.com, LLC

1
2
3
4

BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.
L. Timothy Fisher (State Bar No. 191626)
Julia A. Luster (State Bar No. 295031)
1990 North California Boulevard, Suite 940
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

10

BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.
Scott A. Bursor (State Bar No. 276006)
Joshua D. Arisohn (Pro Hac Vice)
888 Seventh Avenue
New York, NY 10019
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

11

Attorneys for Plaintiff

7
8
9

12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15
16

BENJAMIN PEREZ, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated,

17
18
19
20
21

Plaintiff,
v.
MONSTER INC., BEST BUY STORES, LP,
and BESTBUY.COM, LLC,

Case No. 3:15-cv-03885-EMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO
RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT
Honorable Edward M. Chen

Defendants.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT CASE NO. 3:15-CV-03885-EMC

1

Plaintiff Benjamin Perez (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Monster Inc., Best Buy Stores, LP

2

and BestBuy.com, LLC (“Defendants”), by and through their respective counsel of record, enter

3

into the following stipulation.

4

1.

Plaintiff filed his First Amended Complaint on February 10, 2016;

5

2.

Pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendants’ responsive pleading

6
7
8
9
10

is due on Monday, February 29, 2016;
3.

Subject to the Court’s approval, Plaintiff has agreed to extend Defendant’s time to

file a responsive pleading for two weeks, until Monday, March 14, 2016.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: February 17, 2016

11

Respectfully submitted,
SACKS, RICKETTS & CASE LLP

12

By: /s/ Michele Floyd

13

16

Luanne Sacks
Michele Floyd
177 Post Street, Suite 650
San Francisco, CA 94108
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

17

Attorneys for Defendants

14
15

18
Dated: February 17, 2016

BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.

19
20
21
22
23
24

By:

/s/ L. Timothy Fisher
L. Timothy Fisher

L. Timothy Fisher (State Bar No. 191626)
1990 North California Boulevard, Suite 940
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]

25
26
27
28

1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT CASE NO. 3:15-CV-03885-EMC

BURSOR & FISHER, P.A.
Scott A. Bursor (State Bar No. 276006)
Joshua D. Arisohn (Pro Hac Vice)
888 Seventh Avenue
New York, NY 10019
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

1
2
3
4
5
6

Attorneys for Plaintiff

7
8
ATTESTATION
9
10

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1, I, Michele Floyd, attest that all signatories listed, and on

11

whose behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the stipulation’s content and have authorized the

12

stipulation.

13
/s/ Michele Floyd
Michele Floyd

14
15

18

20

R NIA

DERED
SO OR ED
IT IS
I
_____________________________________
MODIF
AS Edward M. Chen
The Honorable

3/7/2016
Dated: ____________________, 2015

RT

ER

H

22

LI

21

23

FO

NO

United States District Judge
n
M. Che
Edward
Judge

A

19

S

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

RT
U
O

17

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

[PROPOSED] ORDER

UNIT
ED

16

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

24
25
26
27
28

2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT CASE NO. 3:15-CV-03885-EMC