Bundy v. Malnove Incorporated of Utah et al

Filing 35

ORDER: Case Management Statement due by 8/4/2016. Further Case Management Conference set for 8/11/2016 10:00 AM. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 6/30/2016. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2016)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 THOMAS BUNDY, Case No. 15-cv-03899-MEJ Plaintiff, 5 ORDER SCHEDULING FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE v. 6 7 MALNOVE INCORPORATED OF UTAH, et al., Defendants. 8 9 10 On November 25, 2015, the Court issued a Case Management Order in this case, referring United States District Court Northern District of California 11 the parties to mediation and setting a dispositive motion filing deadline of June 23, 2016. Dkt. No. 12 28. Although the parties participated in mediation in February 2016, they were unable to 13 informally resolve the matter. Dkt. No. 34. Further, neither party filed a dispositive motion by the 14 deadlines. Accordingly, the Court hereby schedules a Further Case Management Conference on 15 16 17 18 19 August 11, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom B, 15th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102. This conference shall be attended by lead trial counsel for parties who are represented. The parties shall file an updated Joint Case Management Statement by August 4, 2016. No chambers copy is required. In addition to the information in the Standing Order for All Judges in the Northern District of California, available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/mejorders, the parties 20 shall indicate whether they wish to extend any deadlines in this case, including mediation and 21 22 23 dispositive motion deadlines. If one or more parties feel it would be beneficial to attend a settlement conference with another magistrate judge, they shall so indicate. IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: June 30, 2016 ______________________________________ MARIA-ELENA JAMES United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?