Lloyd T Whitaker v. Daniel G Hickey , Jr. et al

Filing 48

ORDER RE STAY AND FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 46 .(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 LLOYD T. WHITAKER, in his capacity as the Liquidating Trustee of the Embarcadero Liquidating Trust, 14 15 16 No. C 15-03904 WHA Plaintiff, v. 18 DANIEL G. HICKEY, JR., DANIEL G. HICKEY, SR., JAMES J. SCARDINO, CHESTER J . WALCZYK, JOSEPH F. TAYLOR, KEITH HYNES, and DAVID M. BIRSNER, 19 ORDER RE STAY AND FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Defendants. 17 20 21 / Based on the parties’ stipulation and their representations at today’s case management 22 conference, this case is hereby STAYED UNTIL JUNE 16, 2016. A further case management 23 conference is hereby set for ELEVEN A.M. ON JUNE 16, 2016. The parties shall file a joint case 24 management statement by JUNE 9, 2016. It is very unlikely that the stay in this case will be 25 continued past June. Certainly, the case will not be further stayed at that point without 26 defendants having submitted sworn evidence detailing each of their financial conditions and 27 financial ability to defend against this lawsuit. 28 1 By DECEMBER 31, 2015, the parties shall file a joint statement indicating whether the 2 two insurance companies involved in our case will agree to mediation by a magistrate judge in 3 the Northern District of California. If yes, then the Court will promptly appoint a mediator. If 4 the insurance companies do not agree to mediation, then the case will remain stayed until June. 5 The hearing set for January 21 is VACATED. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 Dated: December 17, 2015. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?