Tucker et al v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc.

Filing 18

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 16 Stipulation selecting Private ADR. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/12/2015)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GREGORY K. TUCKER AND
REBECCA TUCKER,
Plaintiff(s),

v.

CASE NO. 3:15-CV-03930-HSG
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

WRIGHT MEDICAL GROUP, INC.,
WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
AND DOES 1 THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE,
Defendant(s).
_____________________.!
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to patticipate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
0
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
0
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
0
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
Private Process:
X
Private ADR (please identifY process and provider) Private mediation

The patties agree to hold the ADR session by:
0
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days fi'om the date of the order

referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)
X

Dated:

Dated:

other requested deadline 150 days, to allow parties to engage in discovery.

I 1- lu-I)

11/1 0 /1

'5
ttorney for De ndant
Michelle Gillette
MINTZ LEVIN COHEN FERRIS
GLOVSKY AND POPEO PC

CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE

[PROPOSED] ORDER

X
0
0

The parties' stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties' stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 11/12/2015
UNITED STATES DISTRICT

JUDGE

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation."

Rev. 12/11

Page 2 of