Tucker et al v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc.
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. REGARDING BRIEFING AND HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S DAUBERT MOTIONS (denying 79 Motion to Shorten Time as moot). (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2016)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
GREGORY K. TUCKER, et al.,
Case No. 15-cv-03930-HSG
ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING AND
HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S
WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Re: Dkt. No. 79
On October 11, 2016, Defendant Wright Medical Technology filed four Daubert motions
to exclude testimony, see Dkt. Nos. 60-67, and five other motions in limine, see Dkt. Nos. 68-72.
On October 13, 2016, Defendant filed a motion to shorten time to hear Defendant’s Daubert
motions. See Dkt. No. 79.
The Court construes Defendant’s Daubert motions as motions in limine under the Court’s
Civil Pretrial and Trial Standing Order. Accordingly, Defendant’s Daubert motions will be heard
at the November 1, 2016 pretrial conference. See Civil Pretrial and Trial Standing Order ¶ 24.
Plaintiffs may file responses of no more than twenty-fives pages each by October 24, 2016, and
Defendant will not be permitted a reply. See id. ¶ 23. In light of the foregoing, the Court DENIES
AS MOOT Defendant’s motion to shorten time. Dkt. No. 79.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?