Tucker et al v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc.

Filing 80

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. REGARDING BRIEFING AND HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S DAUBERT MOTIONS (denying 79 Motion to Shorten Time as moot). (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2016)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

GREGORY K. TUCKER, et al.,

Case No. 15-cv-03930-HSG

Plaintiffs,
8

ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING AND
HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S
DAUBERT MOTIONS

v.
9
WRIGHT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY,
INC.,

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

10

Defendant.

Re: Dkt. No. 79

12
13

On October 11, 2016, Defendant Wright Medical Technology filed four Daubert motions

14

to exclude testimony, see Dkt. Nos. 60-67, and five other motions in limine, see Dkt. Nos. 68-72.

15

On October 13, 2016, Defendant filed a motion to shorten time to hear Defendant’s Daubert

16

motions. See Dkt. No. 79.

17

The Court construes Defendant’s Daubert motions as motions in limine under the Court’s

18

Civil Pretrial and Trial Standing Order. Accordingly, Defendant’s Daubert motions will be heard

19

at the November 1, 2016 pretrial conference. See Civil Pretrial and Trial Standing Order ¶ 24.

20

Plaintiffs may file responses of no more than twenty-fives pages each by October 24, 2016, and

21

Defendant will not be permitted a reply. See id. ¶ 23. In light of the foregoing, the Court DENIES

22

AS MOOT Defendant’s motion to shorten time. Dkt. No. 79.

23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 10/14/2016
______________________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge