Smith v. Ducart et al
Filing
31
ORDER AMENDING COMPLAINT RETROACTIVELY; DIRECTING SERVICE OF NEWLY NAMED DEFENDANTS; EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR DISPOSITIVE MOTION. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 2/17/16. (dl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/17/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
No. C 15-3964 WHA (PR)
Plaintiff,
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
JAMAAL SMITH,
11
12
v.
13
14
15
16
C.E. DUCART; D. MELTON;
LAWRY; SERGEANT J. LACY;
OFFICER A. SCHAAD; OFFICER S.
KERIK; OFFICER H. HANOVER;
OFFICER M. HUMPHREY;
OFFICER P. HICKS,
ORDER AMENDING COMPLAINT
RETROACTIVELY; DIRECTING
SERVICE OF NEWLY NAMED
DEFENDANTS; EXTENDING
DEADLINE FOR DISPOSITIVE
MOTION
Defendants.
17
/
18
19
Plaintiff, an inmate at Kern Valley State Prison, filed this civil rights case under 42
20
U.S.C. 1983 alleging that prison officials ant Pelican Bay State Prison (“PBSP”), where
21
Plaintiff was formerly housed, violated his constitutional rights. The complaint was found to
22
state cognizable claims against three named defendants — Warden C.E. Ducart, Correctional
23
Captain D. Melton, and Correctional Lieutenant Lawry — and it was served upon them. The
24
complaint also made allegations against Doe defendants, which allegations were also found to
25
state cognizable claims for relief. Plaintiff has submitted the names of these Doe defendants.
26
In light of the foregoing,
27
1.
28
The complaint is retroactively amended to replace defendants Does 1-6 with
defendants Sergeant J. Lacy; Officer A. Schaad; Officer S. Kerik; Officer H. Hanover; Officer
1
M. Humphrey; and Officer P. Hicks.
2
2.
The clerk shall issue summons and the United States Marshal shall serve,
3
without prepayment of fees, a copy of the complaint with all attachments thereto, and a copy of
4
this order upon defendants Sergeant J. Lacy; Officer A. Schaad; Officer S. Kerik; Officer
5
H. Hanover; Officer M. Humphrey; and Officer P. Hicks at Pelican Bay State Prison. A
6
7
3.
Defendants shall file an answer in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure.
8
4.
The provisions in the Order of Service regarding dispositive motions, discovery,
or indicate that such a motion is not warranted in this case is extended to and including April 5,
11
For the Northern District of California
and filings remain in effect, except that the deadline for defendants to file a dispositive motion
10
United States District Court
9
2016.
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
Dated: February
14
17
, 2016.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
2
NOTICE -- WARNING (SUMMARY JUDGMENT)
If defendants move for summary judgment, they are seeking to have your case
3
dismissed. A motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil
4
Procedure will, if granted, end your case.
5
Rule 56 tells you what you must do in order to oppose a motion for summary judgment.
fact--that is, if there is no real dispute about any fact that would affect the result of your case,
8
the party who asked for summary judgment is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, which
9
will end your case. When a party you are suing makes a motion for summary judgment that is
10
properly supported by declarations (or other sworn testimony), you cannot simply rely on what
11
For the Northern District of California
Generally, summary judgment must be granted when there is no genuine issue of material
7
United States District Court
6
your complaint says. Instead, you must set out specific facts in declarations, depositions,
12
answers to interrogatories, or authenticated documents, as provided in [current Rule 56(c)], that
13
contradict the facts shown in the defendant's declarations and documents and show that there is
14
a genuine issue of material fact for trial. If you do not submit your own evidence in opposition,
15
summary judgment, if appropriate, may be entered against you. If summary judgment is
16
granted, your case will be dismissed and there will be no trial.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?