Ditlevson v. Legal Express, Ltd. et al
Filing
14
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF DOCUMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE COURT'S STANDING ORDERS. Defendant Legal Express is ordered to submit a chambers copy of its Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 16, 2015. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
LISA MARIE DITLEVSON,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
16
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO
SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF
DOCUMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH
CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE
COURT’S STANDING ORDERS
v.
LEGAL EXPRESS, LTD., a California
corporation; KRAIG VORSATZ, individually
and in his official capacity; and DOES 1
through 10, inclusive,
Defendants.
/
17
18
No. C-15-3977 MMC
On October 8, 2015, defendant Legal Express, LTD. (“Legal Express”) electronically
filed its Answer to Plaintiff’s Complaint. Legal Express has violated the Civil Local Rules of
this District and the Court’s Standing Orders, however, by failing “to provide for chambers a
paper copy of each document that is electronically filed . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’.” See
Civil L.R. 5-1(e)(7); see also Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable
Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2.
Legal Express is hereby ORDERED to comply with Civil Local Rule 5-1(e)(7) and
the Court’s Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the abovereferenced document. Legal Express is hereby advised that if it fails in the future to comply
with the Court’s Standing Orders to provide a chambers copy of each electronically filed
document, the Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the
1
record any electronically filed document for which a chambers copy has not been timely
2
provided to the Court.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Dated: October 16, 2015
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?