Ditlevson v. Legal Express, Ltd. et al

Filing 22

STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 25, 2015. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/25/2015)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LISA MARIE DITLEVSON,

Case No. 3:15-CV-03977-MMC
Plaintiff,

v.
LEGAL EXPRESS, LTD., a California
corporation, KRAIG VORSATZ,
individually and in his official capacity; and
DOES I through 10, inclusive,

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Defendant.
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following
stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably
more likely to meet their needs that any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone
conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone
Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5.)
Private Process:
Private ADR (please identify process and provider)

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)
other requested deadline

-1-

Dated: November 24, 2015

/s/ Fred W. Schwinn
Attorney for Plaintiff
LISA MARIE DITLEVSON

Dated: November 24, 2015

/s/ Amanda F. Riley
Attorney for Defendant
LEGAL EXPRESS, LTD.
[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to:
Non-binding Arbitration
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)
Mediation
Private ADR
Deadline for ADR session
90 days from the date of this order.
Other
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 25, 2015
UNITED STATES
DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE

-2-