Chan v. United States of America

Filing 9

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 8 Stipulation To Extend Time To File Answer Or Otherwise Respond To Complaint. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2015)

Download PDF
1 BRIAN J. STRETCH (CABN 163973) Acting United States Attorney 2 THOMAS MOORE (ASBN 4305-078T) Chief, Tax Division 3 CYNTHIA STIER (DCBN 423256) 4 Assistant United States Attorney 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 San Francisco, California 94102-3495 5 Telephone: (415) 436-7000 6 FAX: (415) 436-7009 7 Attorneys for the United States 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 LILLIAN CHAN, Case No. CV-15-03982-HSG 13 Plaintiffs, 14 v. 15 16 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND ORDER UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 17 Defendant. 18 19 Plaintiff, Lillian Chan, and Defendant, United States of America, through their respective 20 counsels, hereby agree and stipulate as follows: 21 1. That Defendant, United States America, be granted 60 days additional days to answer or 22 otherwise respond to the Complaint in order to enable the United States to obtain the relevant 23 information and documentation from the Internal Revenue Service necessary to answer or otherwise 24 respond to the Complaint. 25 2. That the Answer to the Complaint be filed on or before January 4, 2016. 26 SO STIPULATED: 27 28 1 2 ___________/s/__________________ RONALD CHUN Attorney for the Plaintiff 3 4 5 BRIAN J. STRETCH Acting United States Attorney 6 7 8 __________/S/____________ CYNTHIA STIER Assistant U.S. Attorney Tax Division 9 10 11 12 ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the Defendant United States of America, defendant herein, answer or respond to the Complaint by January 4, 2016. . 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ______________________________ HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?