Chan v. United States of America
Filing
9
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 8 Stipulation To Extend Time To File Answer Or Otherwise Respond To Complaint. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2015)
1 BRIAN J. STRETCH (CABN 163973)
Acting United States Attorney
2 THOMAS MOORE (ASBN 4305-078T)
Chief, Tax Division
3
CYNTHIA STIER (DCBN 423256)
4 Assistant United States Attorney
450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055
San Francisco, California 94102-3495
5
Telephone: (415) 436-7000
6
FAX: (415) 436-7009
7
Attorneys for the United States
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
LILLIAN CHAN,
Case No. CV-15-03982-HSG
13
Plaintiffs,
14
v.
15
16
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE
ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT AND ORDER
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
17
Defendant.
18
19
Plaintiff, Lillian Chan, and Defendant, United States of America, through their respective
20
counsels, hereby agree and stipulate as follows:
21
1.
That Defendant, United States America, be granted 60 days additional days to answer or
22
otherwise respond to the Complaint in order to enable the United States to obtain the relevant
23
information and documentation from the Internal Revenue Service necessary to answer or otherwise
24
respond to the Complaint.
25
2.
That the Answer to the Complaint be filed on or before January 4, 2016.
26
SO STIPULATED:
27
28
1
2
___________/s/__________________
RONALD CHUN
Attorney for the Plaintiff
3
4
5
BRIAN J. STRETCH
Acting United States Attorney
6
7
8
__________/S/____________
CYNTHIA STIER
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Tax Division
9
10
11
12
ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the Defendant United States of
America, defendant herein, answer or respond to the Complaint by January 4, 2016. .
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
______________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?