PhantomALERT, Inc. v. Google Inc. et al

Filing 18

ORDER GRANTING re 17 Stipulation To Extend Time to Respond to Complaint filed by Waze, Inc., Google Inc.. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero on 9/18/15. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6

DURIE TANGRI LLP
MICHAEL H. PAGE (SBN 154913)
[e-mail]
SONALI D. MAITRA (SBN 254896)
[e-mail]
217 Leidesdorff Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
415-236-6300
Attorneys for Defendants
GOOGLE INC. and WAZE, INC.

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

KRONENBERGER ROSENFELD, LLP
KARL S. KRONENBERGER (SBN 226112)
[e-mail]
JEFFREY M. ROSENFELD (SBN 222187)
[e-mail]
ANSEL J. HALLIBURTON (SBN 282906)
[e-mail]
150 Post Street, Suite 520
San Francisco, CA 94108
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415-955-1158
Attorneys for Plaintiff
PhantomALERT, Inc.

15
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

18
19

PHANTOMALERT, INC., a Delaware
corporation,

20
21
22
23

Plaintiff,

Case No. 3:15-cv-03986-JCS
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Ctrm: G – 15th Floor
Judge: Honorable Joseph C. Spero

v.
GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation,
WAZE, INC., a Delaware corporation, and
DOES 1–10, inclusive,

24
25

Defendants.

26
27
28

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT / CASE NO. 3:15-CV-03986-JCS

1

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), Defendants Google Inc. and Waze, Inc. (collectively

2

“Defendants”) hereby submit the following stipulation between the parties in this action extending the

3

time for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff PhantomALERT, Inc.’s Complaint for Damages and

4

Equitable and Other Relief (“Complaint”):

5
6

WHEREAS, the Parties have mutually agreed to a thirty (30) day extension of time for
Defendants to file a response to the Complaint; and

7
8

WHEREAS, this extension of time will not alter any event or deadline already fixed by Court
order.

9

THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated and agreed through counsel that the time in which

10

Defendants may respond to the Complaint is extended for thirty (30) days. Defendants shall file their

11

response to the Complaint on or before October 26, 2015.

12
13

DURIE TANGRI LLP

Dated: September 16, 2015

14
/s/ Michael H. Page
MICHAEL H. PAGE

By:
15
16

Attorneys for Defendants
GOOGLE INC. and WAZE, INC.

17
18

Dated: September 16, 2015

19

KRONENBERGER ROSENFELD, LLP
/s/ Karl S. Kronenberger
KARL S. KRONENBERGER

By:

20

Attorneys for Plaintiff
PHANTOMALERT, INC.

21
22
23

FILER’S ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), regarding signatures, I, Michael H. Page, attest that concurrence

24

in the filing of this document has been obtained.

25

Dated: September 16, 2015

/s/ Michael H. Page
MICHAEL H. PAGE

26
27
28
1

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT / CASE NO. 3:15-CV-03986-JCS

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

1
2
3

I hereby certify that on September 16, 2015 the within document was filed with the Clerk of the
Court using CM/ECF which will send notification of such filing to the attorneys of record in this case.

4
/s/ Michael H. Page
MICHAEL H. PAGE

5
6
7
8

Dated: 9/18/15

IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Joseph C. Spero
Chief Magistrate Judge

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT / CASE NO. 3:15-CV-03986-JCS