Evanston Insurance Company v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Filing
35
ORDER DENYING 28 REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ADR CERTIFICATION.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/23/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
EVANSTON INSURANCE CO,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER DENYING REQUEST
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO
FILE ADR CERTIFICATION
UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC,
Defendant.
/
15
16
No. C 15-03988 WHA
The parties have filed a request for an extension of time to file an ADR certification
17
until after the Court has ruled on the pending motion to dismiss counterclaims. Good cause not
18
shown, the motion is DENIED. The parties shall comply with the local rules.
19
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: November 23, 2015.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?