Evanston Insurance Company v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

Filing 35

ORDER DENYING 28 REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ADR CERTIFICATION.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/23/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
EVANSTON INSURANCE CO,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER DENYING REQUEST
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO
FILE ADR CERTIFICATION

UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC,
Defendant.
/

15
16

No. C 15-03988 WHA

The parties have filed a request for an extension of time to file an ADR certification

17

until after the Court has ruled on the pending motion to dismiss counterclaims. Good cause not

18

shown, the motion is DENIED. The parties shall comply with the local rules.

19
20

IT IS SO ORDERED.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: November 23, 2015.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE