Evanston Insurance Company v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

Filing 77

ORDER GRANTING 76 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/21/2016)

REED SMITH LLP

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware

1 David E. Weiss (SBN 148147)
Email:
[e-mail]
2 Cristina M. Shea (SBN 179895)
Email:
[e-mail]
3 Melissa A. Meth (SBN 263571)
Email:
[e-mail]
4 REED SMITH LLP
101 Second Street
5 Suite 1800
San Francisco, CA 94105-3659
6 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
7
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
8 Uber Technologies, Inc., and Counterclaimants
Rasier LLC and Rasier-CA LLC
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY,
Case No. 3:15-cv-03988-WHA
13
Plaintiff,
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
14
vs.
15
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
16
Defendant.
17
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER LLC,
18 RASIER-CA LLC,
19

Counterclaimants,

COMPL. FILED: 09/01/15
TRIAL DATE: 11/21/16

20 EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY; FIRST
HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ALSUP
21 MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY,
Counterdefendants.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
No. 3:15-cv-03988-WHA

–1–
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

1

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff and Counterdefendant

2 Evanston Insurance Company (“Evanston”) voluntarily dismisses its claims in the above-captioned
3 action against Counterclaimants Uber Technologies, Inc, Rasier LLC and Rasier-CA LLC
4 (collectively “Counterclaimants”), WITH PREJUDICE.
5

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(c), Counterclaimants voluntarily dismiss their

6 claims in the above-captioned action against Evanston WITH PREJUDICE. Counterclaimants and
7 Evanston shall each bear their own fees and costs in connection with this action.
8

In light of the Court’s prior dismissal of First Mercury Insurance Company, see Dkt. 75, with

9 this Order, all remaining claims in the matter are hereby dismissed.

REED SMITH LLP

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware

10 DATED: July 21, 2016

REED SMITH LLP

11
By: /s/ David E. Weiss
David E. Weiss
Cristina M. Shea
Melissa A. Meth
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimants
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier LLC, Rasier-CA LLC

12
13
14
15
16 DATED: July 21, 2016

COZEN O’CONNOR

17
By: /s/ Irene K. Yesowitch
Irene K. Yesowitch
Alicia M. Gurries
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Evanston
Insurance Company

18
19
20
21
22

23 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
July 21, 2016.
25 DATED: ________________________
26

____________________________________________
Hon. William H. Alsup
United States District

27
28
No. 3:15-cv-03988-WHA

–2–
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL