Nasseri v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Filing 35

ORDER GRANTING 34 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/23/2015)

Download PDF
1 MARK D. LONERGAN (State Bar No. 143622) THOMAS N. ABBOTT (State Bar No. 245568) 2 tna@severson.com KIMBERLY A. PAESE (State Bar No. 258594) 3 kap@severson.com SEVERSON & WERSON 4 A Professional Corporation One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600 5 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 398-3344 6 Facsimile: (415) 956-0439 7 Attorneys for Defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA — SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 FARIBA NASSERI, an individual, Case No. 3:15-cv-04001-WHA 13 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT 14 Plaintiffs, vs. 15 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., a national association; and DOES through 100, inclusive, 16 Defendants. 17 Filed concurrently with [Proposed] Order Granting Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer Complaint Hon. William Alsup 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 55000.1680/6083378.1 3:15-cv-04001-WHA STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT 1 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1, the parties hereby stipulate to extend the deadline of 2 defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) to answer the complaint filed by plaintiff 3 Fariba Nasseri. Wells Fargo will file its responsive pleading on or before January 8, 2016. 4 The parties desire to extend time due the change in handling attorney for Wells Fargo and 5 to permit sufficient time for Wells Fargo to prepare a detailed answer following the Court’s order 6 denying Wells Fargo’s motion to dismiss. No previous modifications have been requested or 7 made. Upon information and belief, this requested extension will not alter the date of any other 8 event or any deadline already fixed by Court order. Upon information and belief, the requested 9 extension will not affect the schedule set in this case. 10 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 11 DATED: December 22, 2015 12 SEVERSON & WERSON A Professional Corporation 13 By: 14 /s/ Kimberly A. Paese Kimberly A. Paese 15 Attorneys for Defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. 16 17 18 DATED: December 22, 2015 MELLEN LAW FIRM 19 20 By: 21 22 /s/ Jessica Galletta Jessica Galletta, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff FARIBA NASSERI 23 24 25 26 27 28 55000.1680/6083378.1 3:15-cv-04001-WHA 2 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT 1 MARK D. LONERGAN (State Bar No. 143622) THOMAS N. ABBOTT (State Bar No. 245568) 2 tna@severson.com KIMBERLY A. PAESE (State Bar No. 258594) 3 kap@severson.com SEVERSON & WERSON 4 A Professional Corporation One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600 5 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 398-3344 6 Facsimile: (415) 956-0439 7 Attorneys for Defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA — SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 FARIBA NASSERI, an individual, Case No. 3:15-cv-04001-WHA 13 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT 14 Plaintiffs, vs. 15 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., a national association; and DOES through 100, inclusive, 16 Defendants. 17 Filed concurrently with Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer Complaint Hon. William Alsup 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3:15-cv-04001-WHA [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT 55000.1680/6083448.1 1 The Court, having received and reviewed the stipulation of plaintiff Fariba Nasseri and 2 defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) to extend Wells Fargo’s time to answer the 3 Complaint, and good cause appearing, hereby orders as follows: 4 Wells Fargo shall have up to and until January 8, 2016 to file an answer to the Complaint. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Dated: December 23, 2015. Honorable William Alsup 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3:15-cv-04001-WHA 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT 55000.1680/6083448.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?