Nasseri v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Filing
35
ORDER GRANTING 34 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/23/2015)
1 MARK D. LONERGAN (State Bar No. 143622)
THOMAS N. ABBOTT (State Bar No. 245568)
2 tna@severson.com
KIMBERLY A. PAESE (State Bar No. 258594)
3 kap@severson.com
SEVERSON & WERSON
4 A Professional Corporation
One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600
5 San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 398-3344
6 Facsimile: (415) 956-0439
7 Attorneys for Defendant
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA — SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12 FARIBA NASSERI, an individual,
Case No. 3:15-cv-04001-WHA
13
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
ANSWER COMPLAINT
14
Plaintiffs,
vs.
15 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., a national
association; and DOES through 100, inclusive,
16
Defendants.
17
Filed concurrently with [Proposed] Order
Granting Stipulation to Extend Time to
Answer Complaint
Hon. William Alsup
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
55000.1680/6083378.1
3:15-cv-04001-WHA
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT
1
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1, the parties hereby stipulate to extend the deadline of
2 defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) to answer the complaint filed by plaintiff
3 Fariba Nasseri. Wells Fargo will file its responsive pleading on or before January 8, 2016.
4
The parties desire to extend time due the change in handling attorney for Wells Fargo and
5 to permit sufficient time for Wells Fargo to prepare a detailed answer following the Court’s order
6 denying Wells Fargo’s motion to dismiss. No previous modifications have been requested or
7 made. Upon information and belief, this requested extension will not alter the date of any other
8 event or any deadline already fixed by Court order. Upon information and belief, the requested
9 extension will not affect the schedule set in this case.
10
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
11 DATED: December 22, 2015
12
SEVERSON & WERSON
A Professional Corporation
13
By:
14
/s/ Kimberly A. Paese
Kimberly A. Paese
15
Attorneys for Defendant
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
16
17
18 DATED: December 22, 2015
MELLEN LAW FIRM
19
20
By:
21
22
/s/ Jessica Galletta
Jessica Galletta, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
FARIBA NASSERI
23
24
25
26
27
28
55000.1680/6083378.1
3:15-cv-04001-WHA
2
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT
1 MARK D. LONERGAN (State Bar No. 143622)
THOMAS N. ABBOTT (State Bar No. 245568)
2 tna@severson.com
KIMBERLY A. PAESE (State Bar No. 258594)
3 kap@severson.com
SEVERSON & WERSON
4 A Professional Corporation
One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600
5 San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 398-3344
6 Facsimile: (415) 956-0439
7 Attorneys for Defendant
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA — SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12 FARIBA NASSERI, an individual,
Case No. 3:15-cv-04001-WHA
13
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
ANSWER COMPLAINT
14
Plaintiffs,
vs.
15 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., a national
association; and DOES through 100, inclusive,
16
Defendants.
17
Filed concurrently with Stipulation to Extend
Time to Answer Complaint
Hon. William Alsup
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3:15-cv-04001-WHA
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT
55000.1680/6083448.1
1
The Court, having received and reviewed the stipulation of plaintiff Fariba Nasseri and
2 defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) to extend Wells Fargo’s time to answer the
3 Complaint, and good cause appearing, hereby orders as follows:
4
Wells Fargo shall have up to and until January 8, 2016 to file an answer to the Complaint.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7 Dated: December 23, 2015.
Honorable William Alsup
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3:15-cv-04001-WHA
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT
55000.1680/6083448.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?