Nasseri v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Filing 53

ORDER DENYING 51 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DATES.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

12
13
14

No. C 15-04001 WHA

FARIBA NASSERI,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER DENYING STIPULATION
TO CONTINUE DATES

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
Defendant.
/

15
16

The Court has received the parties’ stipulated request to continue all dates for four

17

months while Wells Fargo considers plaintiff for a loan modification. There is no reason why

18

the parties cannot continue to litigate while the loan modification process plays out. The

19

undersigned judge has learned the hard way that extending dates as requested simply allows the

20

parties to focus on something else. The request to continue all dates for four months is DENIED.

21

If, however, Wells Fargo represents to the Court, in writing, that there is a high chance plaintiff

22

will be approved for a loan modification and plaintiff agrees, in writing, that such a

23

modification would definitely settle the case, then the Court would consider a three week

24

extension of all dates. Meanwhile, all dates remain in place.

25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.

27
28

Dated: March 22, 2016.

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE