Jennifer Arnold v. County of Alameda et al

Filing 22

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 21 Stipulation to Modify Briefing Schedule. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/28/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 R. Boone Callaway (#126664) boone@callawayandwolf.com Nathaniel M. Leeds (#246138) nathaniel@callawayandwolf.com CALLAWAY & WOLF 150 Post Street, Suite 600 San Francisco, CA 94108 Telephone: (415) 541-0300 Facsimile: (415) 777-6262 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff Jennifer Arnold 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHEN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ) Case: 15-cv-04083 HSG ) ) [PROPOSED] ORDER Re: Plaintiff, vs. ) STIPULATED BRIEFING SCHEDULE ) The County of Alameda, a municipal ) corporation, ) Sheriff Gregory J. Ahern, individually and in ) his official capacity as Sheriff of the County of ) Alameda, and ) Does 1 through 25, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ) Jennifer Arnold, Plaintiff Jennifer Arnold, and Defendants The County of Alameda, and Sheriff Gregory J. 18 Ahern, have submitted a stipulation proposing a briefing schedule for Defendants’ Motion for 19 Judgment on the Pleadings, currently set for hearing on February 25, 2016. The parties’ proposed 20 briefing schedule is as follows: 21 Plaintiff shall have until January 6, 2016, to oppose defendants The County of 22 Alameda, and Sheriff Gregory J. Ahern’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, 23 and Defendants shall have until January 27, 2016, to reply to Plaintiff’s opposition. 24 The request of the parties having been duly considered, the Court hereby adopts the 25 proposed briefing schedule as the order of the Court. 26 IT IS SO ORDERED 27 Dated: 12/28/2015 By: 28 ___________________________________ JUDGE OF THE NORTHERN DISTRICT _____________________________________________________________________________________________ [PROPOSED] ORDER Re: STIPULATED BRIEFING SCHEDULE Page 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?