Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. et al v. Lilith Games (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 53

ORDER granting 46 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Plaintiffs' Time To Respond to uCool's Motion To Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by uCool, Inc. Reset Deadlines as to 44 MOTION to Dismiss First A mended Complaint. Responses due by 3/1/2016. Replies due by 3/14/2016. Motion Hearing reset for 4/8/2016 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 1/22/2016. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2016)

1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
2 Claude M. Stern (Bar No. 96737)
[e-mail]
3 Evette D. Pennypacker (Bar No. 203515)
[e-mail]
4 Michael F. LaFond (Bar No. 303131)
[e-mail]
5 555 Twin Dolphin Dr., 5th Fl.
Redwood Shores, California 94065
6 Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
7
Derek J. Tang (Bar No. 296230)
8
[e-mail]
50 California St., 22nd Fl.
9 San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone:
[phone]
10 Facsimile:
[phone]

KARIN G. PAGNANELLI (SBN 174763),
[e-mail]
MARC E. MAYER (SBN 190969),
[e-mail]
DANIEL A. KOHLER (SBN 285501),
[e-mail]
MITCHELL SILBERBERG & KNUPP LLP
11377 West Olympic Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90064-1683
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Blizzard
Entertainment, Inc. and Valve Corporation

11 Attorneys for uCool, Inc.
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
15
16
Blizzard Entertainment, Inc., and Valve
17 Corporation,

CASE NO. 3:15-cv-04084-CRB
The Honorable Charles R. Breyer

18
19

Plaintiffs,
v.

20 Lilith Games (Shanghai) Co. Ltd., uCool, Inc.,
and uCool Ltd.,
21
Defendants.
22

STIPULATION AND ORDER
REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ TIME TO
RESPOND TO UCOOL’S MOTION TO
DISMISS FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT
Discovery Cutoff:
None Set
Pretrial Conference: None Set
Trial Date:
None Set

23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 3:15-cv-04084-CRB

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ TIME TO RESPOND
TO MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

1

Defendant uCool, Inc. (“uCool”) and Plaintiffs Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. and Valve

2 Corporation (collectively “Plaintiffs”), by and through their respective attorneys, hereby submit
3 the following Joint Stipulation, as follows:
4

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint on January 8, 2016;

5

WHEREAS, the Parties previously conferred and agreed to extend Defendant uCool’s time

6 respond to the First Amended Complaint to February 8, 2016 (Dkt. 39-40);
7

WHEREAS, Defendant uCool filed a Motion To Dismiss the First Amended Complaint on

8 February 8, 2016 (Dkt. 44);
9

WHEREAS, the Parties have conferred and agreed to extend Plaintiffs’ time to oppose

10 uCool’s Motion To Dismiss the First Amended Complaint, and uCool’s time to file a reply in
11 support of said Motion To Dismiss;
12

WHEREAS, no other deadlines will be affected;

13

NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND THE PARTIES JOINTLY

14 REQUEST that the deadline for Plaintiffs’ opposition to uCool’s Motion To Dismiss the First
15 Amended Complaint be extended until March 1, 2016, and the deadline for uCool’s reply in
16 support of its Motion To Dismiss be extended until March 14, 2016.
17

Respectfully submitted,

Respectfully submitted,

18
19
By:

/s/ Evette D. Pennypacker
Evette D. Pennypacker
QUINN EMANUEL
URQUHART & SULLIVAN LLP
Attorneys for Defendant
uCool, Inc.

Dated:

February 22, 2016

20
21
22
23

By:

Dated:

/s/ Marc E. Mayer
Marc E. Mayer
MITCHELL SILBERBERG & KNUPP
LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Blizzard
Entertainment, Inc. and Valve
Corporation
February 22, 2016

24
25
26
27
28
-1-

Case No. 3:15-cv-04084-CRB

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ TIME TO RESPOND
TO MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

1
2

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the

3 filing of this document has been obtained from Marc E. Mayer.
4
5

By:

/s/ Evette D. Pennypacker

6
7

Dated: February 22, 2016

8
9
10
11

ORDER
Defendant uCool, Inc. and Plaintiffs Blizzard Entertainment, Inc. and Valve Corporation

12 have stipulated to extend the deadline for Plaintiffs’ opposition to uCool’s Motion To Dismiss the
13 First Amended Complaint until March 1, 2016, and the deadline for uCool’s reply in support of its
14 Motion To Dismiss until March 14, 2016.
15

The requested extension is GRANTED. Plaintiffs’ opposition to uCool’s Motion To

16 Dismiss the First Amended Complaint will be filed no later than March 1, 2016, and uCool’s reply
17 in support of its Motion To Dismiss will be filed no later than March 14, 2016.
18
19

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20
21 DATED:

February 22, 2016

22
23
24
25

Honorable Charles R. Breyer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

26
27
28
-2-

Case No. 3:15-cv-04084-CRB

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ TIME TO RESPOND
TO MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT