Arviso et al v. Smartpay Leasing, Inc. et al

Filing 32

STIPULATION AND ORDER to Extend Briefing Deadlines Regarding Defendant Smartpay Leasing, Inc's Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Case. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 01/28/2016. (tmiS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2016)

Download PDF
7 BURSOR & FISHER, P.A. Scott A. Bursor (State Bar No. 276006) L. Timothy Fisher (State Bar No. 191626) Annick M. Persinger (State Bar No. 272996) Yeremey Krivoshey (State Bar No. 295032) 1990 North California Boulevard, Suite 940 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Telephone: (925) 300-4455 Facsimile: (925) 407-2700 E-Mail: scott@bursor.com ltfisher@bursor.com apersinger@bursor.com ykrivoshey@bursor.com 8 Attorneys for Plaintiff 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 LINDA ARVISO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 14 Plaintiff, 15 v. 16 SMARTPAY LEASING, INC., 17 Case No. 3:15-cv-04087-TEH STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING DEADLINES REGARDING DEFENDANT SMARTPAY LEASING, INC.’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND STAY CASE Defendant. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING DEADLINES REGARDING DEFENDANT SMARTPAY LEASING INC.’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND STAY CASE CASE NO. 3:15-cv-04087-TEH 1 Plaintiff Linda Arviso (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Smartpay Leasing, Inc. (“Defendant”) 2 (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 3 4 WHEREAS, the Amended Complaint which is the subject of this action was filed on October 27, 2015 (ECF No. 10); 5 WHEREAS, on December 17, 2015, Defendant noticed a Subpoena to Produce 6 Documents, Information, or Objects or the Permit Inspection of Premises in a Civil Action on 7 Agua Water Plus concerning information related to Plaintiff; 8 9 WHEREAS, on December 22, 2015, the Court ordered that Defendant’s answer/response to the Amended Complaint is due by December 28, 2015, that Plaintiff’s Opposition is due by 10 January 29, 2016, that Defendant’s Reply is due by February 10, 2016, and set a Motion Hearing 11 for February 29, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. (ECF No. 19); 12 13 WHEREAS, Defendant filed an Answer to Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint on December 28, 2015 (ECF No. 21); 14 WHEREAS, Defendant filed a Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Stay Case on 15 December 28, 2015 (ECF No. 25) and filed a Declaration of Alan Crystal in Support of Motion to 16 Compel Arbitration and to Stay Case on December 29, 2015 (ECF No. 26); 17 18 WHEREAS, on December 30, 2015, Plaintiff served Defendant via email with a Notice of Deposition of Alan Crystal, scheduled for January 15, 2016; 19 20 WHEREAS, on January 5, 2016, Plaintiff served Defendant via email with Plaintiff’s First Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Plaintiff’s First Set of Interrogatories; 21 WHEREAS, on January 14, 2016, Defendant notified Plaintiff that Defendant will not be 22 responding to Plaintiff’s January 5, 2016 discovery requests and will not be producing Alan 23 Crystal for his noticed deposition due to Defendant’s intention of bringing a motion to stay 24 discovery; 25 26 WHEREAS, on January 19, 2016, Defendant filed a Motion to Stay Discovery (ECF No. 30); 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING DEADLINES REGARDING DEFENDANT SMARTPAY LEASING INC.’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND STAY CASE CASE NO. 3:15-cv-04087-TEH 1 1 WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Stay Discovery is due by 2 February 2, 2016, Defendant’s Reply is due by February 9, 2016, and the Motion Hearing is set for 3 February 29, 2016 at 10:00 a.m.; 4 WHEREAS, Plaintiff asserts that discovery is vital for Plaintiff to adequately respond to 5 Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Stay Case and that Plaintiff would be prejudiced 6 by having to oppose Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Stay Case without the 7 benefit of discovery and before the Court rules on Defendant’s pending Motion to Stay Discovery. 8 NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and request that Plaintiff’s Opposition to 9 Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Stay Case, Defendant’s Reply in support of its 10 motion, and the hearing regarding Defendant’s motion be taken off calendar until such time as the 11 Court rules on Defendant’s pending Motion to Stay Discovery. 12 13 Dated: January 22, 2016 14 BURSOR & FISHER, P.A By: 15 /s/ Yeremey Krivoshey Scott A. Bursor L. Timothy Fisher Annick M. Persinger Yeremey Krivoshey 16 17 Attorneys for Plaintiff 18 19 20 Dated: January 26, 2016 BERMAN & RABIN, P.A. By: 21 /s/ Benjamin N. Hutnick Benjamin N. Hutnick 22 Attorneys for Defendant 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING DEADLINES REGARDING DEFENDANT SMARTPAY LEASING INC.’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND STAY CASE CASE NO. 3:15-cv-04087-TEH 2 1 ATTESTATION AND CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I, Yeremey Krivoshey, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used 3 to file the Stipulation to Extend Briefing Deadlines Regarding Defendant Smartpay Leasing, Inc.’s 4 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Case. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby 5 attest that all counsel whose electronic signatures appear herein provided their authority and 6 concurrence to file the stipulation. 7 8 Dated: January 26, 2016 9 BURSOR & FISHER, P.A By: /s/ Yeremey Krivoshey 10 UNIT ED 13 14 RT U O PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED S THELTON E. HENDERSON United States District Judge J H ER 18 19 FO elton E udge Th RT 17 rson . Hende NO 16 LI 15 A 12 S DISTRICT TE C TA 01/28/2016 R NIA 11 N F D IS T IC T O R C 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING DEADLINES REGARDING DEFENDANT SMARTPAY LEASING INC.’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND STAY CASE CASE NO. 3:15-cv-04087-TEH 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?