Richard Pohly v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.

Filing 118

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: SCHEDULING RE 116 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James on 5/26/2017. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Richard H. Friedman (SBN 221622) rfriedman@friedmanrubin.com Peter J. Mullenix (admitted pro hac vice) pmullenix@friedmanrubin.com FRIEDMAN | RUBIN 51 University Street, Suite 201 Seattle, WA 98101 Tel: 206-501-4446 Fax: 206-623-0794 John Graham Hill (admitted pro hac vice) ghill2013@gmail.com 3251 Huntingdon Place Houston TX 77019 Tel: 713-459-8041 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA AT SAN FRANCISCO 11 12 13 RICHARD POHLY, 14 No. 3:15-cv-04113 MEJ Plaintiff, 15 v. 16 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC., a Delaware corporation headquartered in California, 17 Defendant. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 The parties hereby agree and stipulate that Defendant ISI will be allowed seven court days to file a motion to seal any portion of the following documents, or the exhibits thereto: PLAINTIFF RICHARD POHLY’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DECLARATION OF PETER J. MULLENIX IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND EXHIBITS THERETO; 26 27 28 DECLARATION OF ALAN LIPSCHULTZ, AND EXHIBIT THERETO; and DECLARATION OF BRENDA ULMER, AND EXHIBITS THERETO. STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING No. 5:15-cv-04113 MEJ – Page 1 1 2 DATED: May 25, 2017. 3 FRIEDMAN | RUBIN 4 6 s/ Richard H. Friedman Richard Friedman, No. 221622 s/ Peter J. Mullenix Peter J. Mullenix (admitted pro hac vice) 7 JOHN GRAHAM HILL 8 s/ John Graham Hill John Graham Hill (admitted pro hac vice) 5 9 10 Attorneys for Plaintiff Richard Pohly 11 12 DATED: May 25, 2017. 13 SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM 14 /s/ Allen J. Ruby Allen J. Ruby /s/ Emily reitmeier Emily Reitmeier 15 16 17 Attorneys for Defendant Intuitive Surgical, Inc. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING No. 5:15-cv-04113 MEJ – Page 2 (PROPOSED) ORDER 1 2 3 4 It is ORDERED that Defendant ISI will be allowed seven (7) court days to file a motion to seal any portion of the following documents, or the exhibits thereto: • PLAINTIFF RICHARD POHLY’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; • DECLARATION OF PETER J. MULLENIX IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND EXHIBITS THERETO; 9 • DECLARATION OF ALAN LIPSCHULTZ, AND EXHIBIT THERETO; and 10 • DECLARATION OF BRENDA ULMER, AND EXHIBIT THERETO 5 6 7 8 11 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 15 DATED: 5/26/2017 MARIA-ELENA JAMES United States Magistrate Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING No. 5:15-cv-04113 MEJ – Page 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 2 I hereby certify that on May 25, 2017, I electronically filed the foregoing document with 3 the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to the 4 following: 5 6 Counsel for Defendant Intuitive Surgical, Inc. 7 Allen J. Ruby, SBN 47109 Emily Reitmeier, SBN 305512 SKADDEN ARPS SLATE MEAGHER & FLOM LLP 525 University Avenue, Suite 1400 Palo Alto CA 94301 T: 650-470-4500 F: 650-470-4570 E: allen.ruby@skadden.com E: emily.reitmeier@skadden.com 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Lisa M. Gilford SKADDEN ARPS SLATE MEAGHER & FLOM LLP 300 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles CA 90071 T: (213) 687-5000 F: (213) 687-5600 E: lisa.gilford@skadden.com Taylor F. Brinkman LOCKE LORD 2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 2800 Dallas TX 75201 T: (214) 740-8442 E: tbrinkman@lockelord.com Gregory D. Hull, SBN 57367 ELLENBERG & HULL 4 North 2nd Street, Suite 1240 San Jose CA 95113 T: (408) 998-8500 E: greg@ellenberghull.com 26 27 /s/ Dana C. Watkins Dana C. Watkins 28 STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING No. 5:15-cv-04113 MEJ – Page 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?