Richard Pohly v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
Filing
118
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: SCHEDULING RE 116 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James on 5/26/2017. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Richard H. Friedman (SBN 221622)
rfriedman@friedmanrubin.com
Peter J. Mullenix (admitted pro hac vice)
pmullenix@friedmanrubin.com
FRIEDMAN | RUBIN
51 University Street, Suite 201
Seattle, WA 98101
Tel: 206-501-4446
Fax: 206-623-0794
John Graham Hill (admitted pro hac vice)
ghill2013@gmail.com
3251 Huntingdon Place
Houston TX 77019
Tel: 713-459-8041
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
AT SAN FRANCISCO
11
12
13
RICHARD POHLY,
14
No. 3:15-cv-04113 MEJ
Plaintiff,
15
v.
16
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
REGARDING SCHEDULING
INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC., a Delaware
corporation headquartered in California,
17
Defendant.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
The parties hereby agree and stipulate that Defendant ISI will be allowed seven court days
to file a motion to seal any portion of the following documents, or the exhibits thereto:
PLAINTIFF RICHARD POHLY’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT
INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT;
DECLARATION OF PETER J. MULLENIX IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S
OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT,
AND EXHIBITS THERETO;
26
27
28
DECLARATION OF ALAN LIPSCHULTZ, AND EXHIBIT THERETO; and
DECLARATION OF BRENDA ULMER, AND EXHIBITS THERETO.
STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER
REGARDING SCHEDULING
No. 5:15-cv-04113 MEJ
– Page 1
1
2
DATED:
May 25, 2017.
3
FRIEDMAN | RUBIN
4
6
s/ Richard H. Friedman
Richard Friedman, No. 221622
s/ Peter J. Mullenix
Peter J. Mullenix (admitted pro hac vice)
7
JOHN GRAHAM HILL
8
s/ John Graham Hill
John Graham Hill (admitted pro hac vice)
5
9
10
Attorneys for Plaintiff Richard Pohly
11
12
DATED:
May 25, 2017.
13
SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM
14
/s/ Allen J. Ruby
Allen J. Ruby
/s/ Emily reitmeier
Emily Reitmeier
15
16
17
Attorneys for Defendant Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER
REGARDING SCHEDULING
No. 5:15-cv-04113 MEJ
– Page 2
(PROPOSED) ORDER
1
2
3
4
It is ORDERED that Defendant ISI will be allowed seven (7) court days to file a motion
to seal any portion of the following documents, or the exhibits thereto:
•
PLAINTIFF RICHARD POHLY’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT
INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT;
•
DECLARATION OF PETER J. MULLENIX IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S
OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT,
AND EXHIBITS THERETO;
9
•
DECLARATION OF ALAN LIPSCHULTZ, AND EXHIBIT THERETO; and
10
•
DECLARATION OF BRENDA ULMER, AND EXHIBIT THERETO
5
6
7
8
11
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
15
DATED: 5/26/2017
MARIA-ELENA JAMES
United States Magistrate Judge
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER
REGARDING SCHEDULING
No. 5:15-cv-04113 MEJ
– Page 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
1
2
I hereby certify that on May 25, 2017, I electronically filed the foregoing document with
3
the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to the
4
following:
5
6
Counsel for Defendant Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
7
Allen J. Ruby, SBN 47109
Emily Reitmeier, SBN 305512
SKADDEN ARPS SLATE MEAGHER & FLOM LLP
525 University Avenue, Suite 1400
Palo Alto CA 94301
T: 650-470-4500
F: 650-470-4570
E: allen.ruby@skadden.com
E: emily.reitmeier@skadden.com
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Lisa M. Gilford
SKADDEN ARPS SLATE MEAGHER & FLOM LLP
300 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles CA 90071
T: (213) 687-5000
F: (213) 687-5600
E: lisa.gilford@skadden.com
Taylor F. Brinkman
LOCKE LORD
2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 2800
Dallas TX 75201
T: (214) 740-8442
E: tbrinkman@lockelord.com
Gregory D. Hull, SBN 57367
ELLENBERG & HULL
4 North 2nd Street, Suite 1240
San Jose CA 95113
T: (408) 998-8500
E: greg@ellenberghull.com
26
27
/s/ Dana C. Watkins
Dana C. Watkins
28
STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER
REGARDING SCHEDULING
No. 5:15-cv-04113 MEJ
– Page 4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?