Mahmoud Khoshdelazad v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada et al

Filing 41

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 40 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE filed by Mahmoud Khoshdelazad. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 9, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Glenn R. Kantor – SBN 122643
E-mail: [e-mail]
Beth A. Davis – SBN 277560
E-mail: [e-mail]
KANTOR & KANTOR, LLP
19839 Nordhoff Street
Northridge, California 91324
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MAHMOUD KHOSHDELAZAD

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
MAHMOUD KHOSHDELAZAD,

12
KANTOR & KANTOR LLP
19839 Nordhoff Street
Northridge, California 91324
[phone]

11

Plaintiff,
vs.

13
14
15
16

CASE NO: 3:15-cv-04123-JST
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE;
[PROPOSED] ORDER

SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY
OF CANADA; AVID TECHNOLOGY
INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY
PLAN,
Defendants.

17
18
19

TO THE HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR AND HIS COURT CLERK:

20

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiff MAHMOUD

21

KHOSHDELAZAD and Defendant SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF

22

CANADA, by and through their respective counsel of record, that this action shall

23

be dismissed with prejudice.
Each party shall bear their own attorney’s fees and costs.

24
25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL

1
2
3

IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: December 30, 2016

4

KANTOR & KANTOR, LLP
By:

5
6

/s/ Glenn R. Kantor
GLENN R. KANTOR
BETH A. DAVIS
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
MAHMOUD KHOSHDELAZAD

7
8
9

Dated: December 30, 2016

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK &
STEWART, P.C.

10
11

By:

KANTOR & KANTOR LLP
19839 Nordhoff Street
Northridge, California 91324
[phone]

12
13
14
15
16
17

/s/ Sean P. Nalty
SEAN P. NALTY
CARA F. BARRICK
Attorneys for Defendant SUN LIFE
ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
AND AVID TECHNOLOGY INC. LONG
TERM DISABILITY PLAN

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures,
Glenn R. Kantor hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document and
its content has been obtained from all signatories listed.

18
19

[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL

20

OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

21
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the above-entitled action is

22
23

dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own fees and

24

costs.

25
26
27

DATED: January 9, 2017

____________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Court Judge

28
2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL