Elizabeth Lloyd v. Vipul Gupta et al

Filing 41

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting #40 Stipulation to Continue Hearing and Briefing dates on Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 ROBERT G. LOEWY LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT G. LOEWY, P.C. 101 Enterprise, Suite 350 Aliso Viejo, California 92660 Phone: (949) 442-7103; Fax: (949) 242-5105 Email: rloewy@rloewy.com Attorneys for Defendants VIPUL GUPTA, NANDITA GUPTA, ASHOK GUPTA, BHARAT GUPTA, AKSHAY GUPTA, AND 60MONTHLOANS, INC. 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 11 ELIZABETH LLOYD, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 VIPUL GUPTA, et al., 15 Case No. 3:15-cv-04183-MEJ [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING AND BRIEFING DATES ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST NANDITA GUPTA Defendants. 16 17 AND RELATED CROSS ACTION 18 The Court, having read the Stipulation of the parties to Continue Hearing and 19 Briefing Dates on Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment against Nandita 20 Gupta, and good cause appearing therefor, now orders as follows: 21 22 1. The hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Dkt No. 33] is continued from June 9, 2016 until __________________________; July 21, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. 23 2. June 23, 2016 Ms. Gupta’s opposition is due no later than ____________________; 24 3. Plaintiff’s reply is due no later than ________________________. July 7, 2016 25 26 27 28 Dated: May 12, 2016 By: U.S. Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?