Elizabeth Lloyd v. Vipul Gupta et al
Filing
41
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting #40 Stipulation to Continue Hearing and Briefing dates on Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
ROBERT G. LOEWY
LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT G. LOEWY, P.C.
101 Enterprise, Suite 350
Aliso Viejo, California 92660
Phone: (949) 442-7103; Fax: (949) 242-5105
Email: rloewy@rloewy.com
Attorneys for Defendants
VIPUL GUPTA, NANDITA GUPTA, ASHOK
GUPTA, BHARAT GUPTA, AKSHAY
GUPTA, AND 60MONTHLOANS, INC.
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
10
11
ELIZABETH LLOYD,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
VIPUL GUPTA, et al.,
15
Case No. 3:15-cv-04183-MEJ
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE
HEARING AND BRIEFING DATES
ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
AGAINST NANDITA GUPTA
Defendants.
16
17
AND RELATED CROSS ACTION
18
The Court, having read the Stipulation of the parties to Continue Hearing and
19
Briefing Dates on Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment against Nandita
20
Gupta, and good cause appearing therefor, now orders as follows:
21
22
1.
The hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Dkt
No. 33] is continued from June 9, 2016 until __________________________;
July 21, 2016 at 10:00 a.m.
23
2.
June 23, 2016
Ms. Gupta’s opposition is due no later than ____________________;
24
3.
Plaintiff’s reply is due no later than ________________________.
July 7, 2016
25
26
27
28
Dated:
May 12, 2016
By:
U.S. Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?