LaChapelle et al v. Maier et al
Filing
40
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 1/13/2016.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 1/6/2016. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
JOSEPH LACHAPELLE, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Case No. 15-cv-04216-JSC
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
v.
KLAUS MAIER, et al.,
Defendants.
12
13
Plaintiffs Joseph Lachapelle and James Field (“Plaintiffs”) filed an action against
14
Defendants Dong Kwan Kim (“Kim”), Young Song (“Song”), ZeroDesktop, Inc.
15
(“ZeroDesktop”), Klaus Maier (“Maier”), nComputing, Inc. (“nComputing”), Daehong Technew
16
Corp. (“DTC”), and a number of Doe Defendants (collectively “Defendants”) to recover allegedly
17
fraudulent transfers and for damages. See Lachapelle v. Kim, No. 3:15-cv-2195 (the “Initial
18
Action”). Plaintiffs allege that Defendants engaged in a scheme to transfer assets from
19
nComputing to ZeroDesktop to prevent Plaintiffs from satisfying an outstanding judgment against
20
Kim. When nComputing and Maier failed to appear in the Initial Action, pursuant to the parties’
21
consent to severance, the Court severed the claims against defaulting defendants nComputing and
22
Maier, and assigned to the severed case to the undersigned judge. LaChapelle v. Kim, No. 3:15-
23
cv-2195, Dkt. No. 32 (Sept. 4, 2015). Plaintiffs have since filed a notice of voluntary dismissal in
24
the Initial Action, listing nComputing and Maier in the case caption, but not referencing this
25
action’s case number. LaChapelle v. Kim, No. 3:15-cv-2195, Dkt. No. 50 (Dec. 17, 2015). Given
26
that the claims are identical, Plaintiffs are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE by January 13, 2016
27
why the instant action against the defaulting defendants should not be dismissed without prejudice
28
pursuant to the notice of dismissal filed in the Initial Action.
1
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 6, 2016
3
4
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
United States Magistrate Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?