LaChapelle et al v. Maier et al

Filing 40

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 1/13/2016.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 1/6/2016. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JOSEPH LACHAPELLE, et al., Plaintiffs, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No. 15-cv-04216-JSC ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v. KLAUS MAIER, et al., Defendants. 12 13 Plaintiffs Joseph Lachapelle and James Field (“Plaintiffs”) filed an action against 14 Defendants Dong Kwan Kim (“Kim”), Young Song (“Song”), ZeroDesktop, Inc. 15 (“ZeroDesktop”), Klaus Maier (“Maier”), nComputing, Inc. (“nComputing”), Daehong Technew 16 Corp. (“DTC”), and a number of Doe Defendants (collectively “Defendants”) to recover allegedly 17 fraudulent transfers and for damages. See Lachapelle v. Kim, No. 3:15-cv-2195 (the “Initial 18 Action”). Plaintiffs allege that Defendants engaged in a scheme to transfer assets from 19 nComputing to ZeroDesktop to prevent Plaintiffs from satisfying an outstanding judgment against 20 Kim. When nComputing and Maier failed to appear in the Initial Action, pursuant to the parties’ 21 consent to severance, the Court severed the claims against defaulting defendants nComputing and 22 Maier, and assigned to the severed case to the undersigned judge. LaChapelle v. Kim, No. 3:15- 23 cv-2195, Dkt. No. 32 (Sept. 4, 2015). Plaintiffs have since filed a notice of voluntary dismissal in 24 the Initial Action, listing nComputing and Maier in the case caption, but not referencing this 25 action’s case number. LaChapelle v. Kim, No. 3:15-cv-2195, Dkt. No. 50 (Dec. 17, 2015). Given 26 that the claims are identical, Plaintiffs are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE by January 13, 2016 27 why the instant action against the defaulting defendants should not be dismissed without prejudice 28 pursuant to the notice of dismissal filed in the Initial Action. 1 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 6, 2016 3 4 JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY United States Magistrate Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?