Langridge v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company

Filing 40

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 2/8/2017. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 David M. Lilienstein, SBN 218923 Jessica M. Cho, SBN 303441 DL LAW GROUP 345 Franklin Street. San Francisco, California 94102 Telephone: (415) 678-5050 Facsimile: (415) 358-8484 E-mail: david@dllawgroup.com, jessica@dllawgroup.com 5 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff, JESSICA LANGRIDGE 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 JESSICA LANGRIDGE, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 v. 14 US ROCHE HEALTH AND WELFARE BENEFITS VEBA PLAN, 15 Defendant. 16 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 3:15-cv-04235-VC NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FRCP 41(a) 18 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to Fed. R.Civ. Pro. 41(a), Plaintiff 19 JESSICA LANGRIDGE requests that the Court dismiss all claims against Defendant US 20 ROCHE HEALTH AND WELFARE BENEFITS VEBA PLAN in the above-captioned 21 action with prejudice. 22 DL LAW GROUP ________ 345 Franklin St San Francisco, CA 94102 Tel: 415-678-5050 Fax: 415-358-8484 23 February 6, 2017 24 Respectfully submitted, DL LAW GROUP 25 26 27 28 By: /s/ David M. Lilienstein, Esq. Jessica M. Cho, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff Jessica Langridge -1NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 3:15-cv-04235-VC [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 All claims against Defendant US ROCHE HEALTH AND WELFARE 3 BENEFITS VEBA PLAN shall be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of 4 Civil Procedure 41(a). 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 Dated: February 8 , 2017 9 10 Hon. Vince Chhabria United States District Court Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 DL LAW GROUP ________ 345 Franklin St San Francisco, CA 94102 Tel: 415-678-5050 Fax: 415-358-8484 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 3:15-cv-04235-VC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?