Langridge v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Filing
40
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 2/8/2017. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2017)
1
2
3
4
David M. Lilienstein, SBN 218923
Jessica M. Cho, SBN 303441
DL LAW GROUP
345 Franklin Street.
San Francisco, California 94102
Telephone: (415) 678-5050
Facsimile: (415) 358-8484
E-mail: david@dllawgroup.com, jessica@dllawgroup.com
5
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
JESSICA LANGRIDGE
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
JESSICA LANGRIDGE,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
v.
14 US ROCHE HEALTH AND WELFARE
BENEFITS VEBA PLAN,
15
Defendant.
16
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 3:15-cv-04235-VC
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
FRCP 41(a)
18 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that pursuant to Fed. R.Civ. Pro. 41(a), Plaintiff
19 JESSICA LANGRIDGE requests that the Court dismiss all claims against Defendant US
20 ROCHE HEALTH AND WELFARE BENEFITS VEBA PLAN in the above-captioned
21 action with prejudice.
22
DL LAW
GROUP
________
345 Franklin St
San Francisco,
CA 94102
Tel: 415-678-5050
Fax: 415-358-8484
23 February 6, 2017
24
Respectfully submitted,
DL LAW GROUP
25
26
27
28
By:
/s/
David M. Lilienstein, Esq.
Jessica M. Cho, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff Jessica Langridge
-1NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:15-cv-04235-VC
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
All claims against Defendant US ROCHE HEALTH AND WELFARE
3
BENEFITS VEBA PLAN shall be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of
4
Civil Procedure 41(a).
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
Dated: February 8
, 2017
9
10
Hon. Vince Chhabria
United States District Court Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
DL LAW
GROUP
________
345 Franklin St
San Francisco,
CA 94102
Tel: 415-678-5050
Fax: 415-358-8484
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:15-cv-04235-VC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?