City Of Oakland v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Filing
103
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 100 filed by The City of Oakland Case Management Statement due by 11/22/2017. Further Case Management Conference reset for 11/30/2017 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint Hearing set for 11/30/2017 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Edward M. Chen. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/15/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2017)
1 BARBARA J. PARKER (SBN 69722)
BParker@oaklandcityattorney.org
2 OAKLAND CITY ATTORNEY
City Hall, 6th Floor
3 One Frank H. Ogawa Plaza
Oakland, CA 94612
4 Telephone: (510) 238-6512
BART H. WILLIAMS (SBN 134009)
bwilliams@proskauer.com
MANUEL F. CACHÁN (SBN 216987)
mcachan@proskauer.com
PROSKAUER ROSE LLP
2049 Century Park East, Suite 3200
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Telephone: (310) 557-290
5 YOSEF PERETZ (SBN 209288)
yperetz@peretzlaw.com
6 RUTH L. ISRAELY (SBN 289586)
risraely@peretzlaw.com
7 PERETZ & ASSOCIATES
22 Battery Street, Suite 200
8 San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 732-3777
9
JOEL LIBERSON (SBN 164857)
10 joel@taresources.com
TRIAL & APPELLATE RESOURCES, P.C.
11 3655 Torrance Blvd., Third Floor
Torrance, CA 90503
12 Telephone: (917) 848-3218
TERRY E. SANCHEZ (SBN 101318)
terry.sanchez@mto.com
MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
355 South Grand Avenue, 35th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90071
Telephone: (213) 683-9100
PAUL F. HANCOCK (admitted pro hac vice)
Paul.Hancock@klgates.com
K&L GATES LLP
200 S. Biscayne Blvd., Suite 3900
Miami, FL 33131
Telephone: (305) 539-3300
Facsimile:
(305) 358-7095
13 ROBERT S. PECK (admitted pro hac vice)
robert.peck@cclfirm.com
14 CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL
LITIGATION
15 50 Riverside Boulevard, Suite 12A
New York, NY 10069
16 Telephone: (202) 944-2874
Attorneys for WELLS FARGO & CO. and
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
17 Attorneys for Plaintiff CITY OF OAKLAND
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
19
NOTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
20
CITY OF OAKLAND, a municipal
21 corporation,
Case No. 3:15-cv-04321-EMC
22
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION FOR PLAINTIFF TO
FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
AND REGARDING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE FOR CHALLENGE TO THE
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
23
Plaintiff,
vs.
24 WELLS FARGO & CO. and WELLS FARGO
BANK, N.A.
25
Defendants.
26
27
28
1
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
3
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION submitted by Plaintiff CITY OF OAKLAND, and
4 Defendants WELLS FARGO & CO. and WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., IT IS SO ORDERED as
5 follows:
6
immediately as a separate
shall
(1) Plaintiff will file the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) by August 9, 2017; document;
7
(2) Defendants may file one or more motions challenging the FAC (the “Motion(s)”) by
8
September 22, 2017. Plaintiff disputes that Defendants may file any motions attacking
9
the FAC except for a motion to dismiss the FAC challenging the proximate cause for
10
damages sought by Plaintiff and reserve all rights with regard to any other challenges
11
that Defendants may bring in the Motion(s);
12
(3) Plaintiff shall file its opposition(s) to the Motion(s) by October 27, 2017;
13
(4) Defendants shall file their reply or replies in further support of the Motion(s) by
14
15
16
17
November 10, 2017;
(5) The Motion(s) shall be set for hearing on November 30, 2017, or the next available
hearing date; and
at 1:30 p.m.
(6) As ordered by the Court at the May 25, 2017 Case Management Conference, the Case
19
Management Conference currently set for October 15, 2017 shall be combined with the
/ on November 30, 2017 at 1:30 p.m.
hearing on the Motion(s). An updated joint Case Management Conference shall be
20
filed no later than 7 days before that hearing.
Hon. Edward M. Chen
2
R NIA
M. Chen
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
R NIA
S
UNIT
ED
H
28
N
. Chen
ward M
udge Ed
ER
LI
J
A
H
27
Judge Edward
ER
FO
RT
RT
26
ORDERED
IT IS SO
AS MODIFIED
NO
NO
25
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
24
ERED
O ORD D
IT IS S
DIFIE
AS MO
LI
23
FO
8/15/2017
S
DATED:
UNIT
ED
22
RT
U
O
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
__________________________
21
A
18
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?