City Of Oakland v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 103

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 100 filed by The City of Oakland Case Management Statement due by 11/22/2017. Further Case Management Conference reset for 11/30/2017 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint Hearing set for 11/30/2017 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Edward M. Chen. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/15/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2017)

Download PDF
1 BARBARA J. PARKER (SBN 69722) BParker@oaklandcityattorney.org 2 OAKLAND CITY ATTORNEY City Hall, 6th Floor 3 One Frank H. Ogawa Plaza Oakland, CA 94612 4 Telephone: (510) 238-6512 BART H. WILLIAMS (SBN 134009) bwilliams@proskauer.com MANUEL F. CACHÁN (SBN 216987) mcachan@proskauer.com PROSKAUER ROSE LLP 2049 Century Park East, Suite 3200 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Telephone: (310) 557-290 5 YOSEF PERETZ (SBN 209288) yperetz@peretzlaw.com 6 RUTH L. ISRAELY (SBN 289586) risraely@peretzlaw.com 7 PERETZ & ASSOCIATES 22 Battery Street, Suite 200 8 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 732-3777 9 JOEL LIBERSON (SBN 164857) 10 joel@taresources.com TRIAL & APPELLATE RESOURCES, P.C. 11 3655 Torrance Blvd., Third Floor Torrance, CA 90503 12 Telephone: (917) 848-3218 TERRY E. SANCHEZ (SBN 101318) terry.sanchez@mto.com MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 355 South Grand Avenue, 35th Floor Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: (213) 683-9100 PAUL F. HANCOCK (admitted pro hac vice) Paul.Hancock@klgates.com K&L GATES LLP 200 S. Biscayne Blvd., Suite 3900 Miami, FL 33131 Telephone: (305) 539-3300 Facsimile: (305) 358-7095 13 ROBERT S. PECK (admitted pro hac vice) robert.peck@cclfirm.com 14 CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL LITIGATION 15 50 Riverside Boulevard, Suite 12A New York, NY 10069 16 Telephone: (202) 944-2874 Attorneys for WELLS FARGO & CO. and WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. 17 Attorneys for Plaintiff CITY OF OAKLAND 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 NOTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 20 CITY OF OAKLAND, a municipal 21 corporation, Case No. 3:15-cv-04321-EMC 22 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR CHALLENGE TO THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 23 Plaintiff, vs. 24 WELLS FARGO & CO. and WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. 25 Defendants. 26 27 28 1 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 3 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION submitted by Plaintiff CITY OF OAKLAND, and 4 Defendants WELLS FARGO & CO. and WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., IT IS SO ORDERED as 5 follows: 6 immediately as a separate shall (1) Plaintiff will file the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) by August 9, 2017; document; 7 (2) Defendants may file one or more motions challenging the FAC (the “Motion(s)”) by 8 September 22, 2017. Plaintiff disputes that Defendants may file any motions attacking 9 the FAC except for a motion to dismiss the FAC challenging the proximate cause for 10 damages sought by Plaintiff and reserve all rights with regard to any other challenges 11 that Defendants may bring in the Motion(s); 12 (3) Plaintiff shall file its opposition(s) to the Motion(s) by October 27, 2017; 13 (4) Defendants shall file their reply or replies in further support of the Motion(s) by 14 15 16 17 November 10, 2017; (5) The Motion(s) shall be set for hearing on November 30, 2017, or the next available hearing date; and at 1:30 p.m. (6) As ordered by the Court at the May 25, 2017 Case Management Conference, the Case 19 Management Conference currently set for October 15, 2017 shall be combined with the / on November 30, 2017 at 1:30 p.m. hearing on the Motion(s). An updated joint Case Management Conference shall be 20 filed no later than 7 days before that hearing. Hon. Edward M. Chen 2 R NIA M. Chen F D IS T IC T O R C R NIA S UNIT ED H 28 N . Chen ward M udge Ed ER LI J A H 27 Judge Edward ER FO RT RT 26 ORDERED IT IS SO AS MODIFIED NO NO 25 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 24 ERED O ORD D IT IS S DIFIE AS MO LI 23 FO 8/15/2017 S DATED: UNIT ED 22 RT U O S DISTRICT TE C TA __________________________ 21 A 18 N F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?