City Of Oakland v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 20

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 17 Stipulation to Set Schedule for Motion to Dismiss (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2015)

1 BARBARA J. PARKER (SBN 69722)
[e-mail]
2 OAKLAND CITY ATTORNEY
200 N. Main Street, Room 800
3 One Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, 6TH Floor
Oakland, CA 94612
4 Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
5
JOEL LIBERSON (SBN 164857)
6 [e-mail]
TRIAL & APPELLATE RESOURCES, P.C.
7 400 Continental Blvd., 6th Floor
El Segundo, CA 90245
8 Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
9 Attorneys for Plaintiff CITY OF OAKLAND
10 BART H. WILLIAMS (SBN 134009)
[e-mail]
11 TERRY E. SANCHEZ (SBN 101318)
[e-mail]
12 DANIEL P. COLLINS (SBN 139164)
[e-mail]
13 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP
355 South Grand Avenue, 35th Floor
14 Los Angeles, California 90071-1560
Telephone:
[phone]
15 Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
16
17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

18

NOTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

19 CITY OF OAKLAND, a municipal
corporation,
20
Plaintiff,
21
vs.
22
WELLS FARGO & CO. and WELLS FARGO
23 BANK, N.A.
24

Case No. 3:15-cv-04321-SK
[PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING
SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO DISMISS

Defendants.

25
26
27
28

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO DISMISS

1
2

[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION submitted by Plaintiff City of Oakland and Defendants

3 Wells Fargo & Co, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., IT IS SO ORDERED as follows:
4

(1) Plaintiff shall file and serve its opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss on or

5 before Monday, December 14, 2015.
6

(2) Defendants shall file and serve their reply in support of the motion to dismiss on or

7 before January 8, 2015.
8

(3) All dates established in the September 22, 2015 Order are vacated. The Initial Case

9 Management Conference provided for by Local R. 16-2, all disclosures by both sides pursuant to
10 Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a), and the ADR Certifications provided for by Local R. 16-8 are deferred until
11 the Court has issued a ruling upon Defendants’ motion to dismiss.
14
12 DATED: October ___, 2015

13

_________________________________

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT