City Of Oakland v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 30

ORDER VACATING HEARING AND DIRECTING PARTIES TO RESPOND. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 2/10/2016. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 THE CITY OF OAKLAND, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 Case No. 15-cv-04321-HSG ORDER VACATING HEARING AND DIRECTING PARTIES TO RESPOND v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., Defendants. The Court informs the parties that the undersigned, while in private practice, represented a 13 Wells Fargo entity in a matter which resulted in the issuance of a consent cease and desist order by 14 the Federal Reserve Board on July 20, 2011. The Court directs the parties to meet and confer and 15 e-file a notice by Monday, February 15, 2016, informing the court whether both parties are in 16 agreement with the undersigned continuing to preside over this case. If both parties are not in 17 agreement, the filing must not specify which party is not in agreement: the filing must simply 18 indicate that both parties either are or are not in agreement. 19 20 The hearing set for February 11, 2016 is VACATED. The Court will issue further orders as appropriate once it reviews the parties’ submission. 21 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 2/10/2016 24 25 26 27 28 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?