Thomas v. City and County of San Francisco et al
Filing
10
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Show Cause Response due by 1/22/2016.. Signed by Judge James Donato on 1/14/16. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
DAVID THOMAS,
7
Plaintiff,
8
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
v.
9
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, et al.,
10
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 15-cv-04330-JD
Defendants.
12
Pro se plaintiff David Thomas filed this case on September 22, 2015. At 1:30 p.m. on
13
14
Wednesday, January 13, 2016, the Court held a case management conference. Plaintiff did not
15
appear at this conference. Plaintiff had made no prior request to be excused from the hearing or to
16
reschedule the hearing date. Accordingly, plaintiff’s failure to appear is unexcused and violates
17
the Court’s standing order for civil cases.
In addition, there is no indication in the ECF docket for this case that plaintiff has served a
18
19
summons on any of the defendants. There is no ECF entry suggesting that plaintiff has even
20
requested the Clerk of the Court to issue a summons. Plaintiff still has a small window until
21
January 20, 2016 to effect service under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m)1 but appears not to
22
be making any effort to do so.
23
These failures concern the Court. Mr. Thomas is ordered to show cause, in writing, why
24
the Court should not dismiss this case for failure to prosecute. Mr. Thomas’ written response is
25
due by January 22, 2016, and should address the following:
26
27
28
1
As of December 1, 2015, Rule 4(m) only allows 90 days for service, but this case was filed
before the Rule changed and plaintiff is pro se, so the Court applies the longer, 120 day period for
service.
1
2
(1) Why the Court should not sanction him for his failure to appear at the case
management conference in this matter;
3
(2) Whether the defendants were served with the complaint and other materials required by
4
Civil Local Rules 4-2 and 16-2 by the January 20, 2016 deadline, or if they were not,
5
whether Mr. Thomas had good cause for his failure to do so.
6
Mr. Thomas is warned that the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice if he does not serve
7
the defendants by January 20, 2016, or demonstrate good cause for his failure to do so by January
8
22, 2016, or otherwise fails to comply with this order.
9
Mr. Thomas is reminded that Civil Local Rule 3-9(a) explicitly states that a party
representing himself without an attorney is still “bound by the Federal Rules, as well as by all
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
applicable local rules. Sanctions (including default or dismissal) may be imposed for failure to
12
comply with local rules.” If Mr. Thomas intends to continue pursuing this case, he may wish to
13
consult a manual the court has adopted to assist pro se litigants in presenting their case. This
14
manual, and other free information, is available online at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/proselitigants.
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 14, 2016
17
18
JAMES DONATO
United States District Judge
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
DAVID THOMAS,
Case No. 15-cv-04330-JD
Plaintiff,
5
v.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
6
7
8
9
10
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, et al.,
Defendants.
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.
District Court, Northern District of California.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
That on January 14, 2016, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by
placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by
depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery
receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
16
17
18
David Thomas
380 Bryan Drive
Alamo, CA 94507
19
20
Dated: January 14, 2016
21
22
23
Susan Y. Soong
Clerk, United States District Court
24
25
26
By:________________________
LISA R. CLARK, Deputy Clerk to the
Honorable JAMES DONATO
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?