Desoto Cab Company, Inc. v. Picker et al

Filing 33

STIPULATION AND ORDER re #32 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Requesting Order to Extend Time to File Opposition and Reply Briefing for Defendants' Motion to Dismiss filed by Desoto Cab Company, Inc.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/19/16. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/19/2016)

1
2
3

Shannon Seibert (CBN 240317)
[e-mail]
Joe Bautista (CBN 255708)
[e-mail]

SEIBERT & BAUTISTA

6

100 Pine Street, Ste. 1250
San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

7

Attorneys for Plaintiff

4
5

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
13

CASE NO.: 3:15-cv-04375-JSC
DESOTO CAB COMPANY, INC., d/b/a
FLYWHEEL TAXI,

14

Plaintiff,
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

[PROPOSED] ORDER
The Honorable Edward M. Chen

vs.
MICHAEL PICKER; MIKE FLORIO;
CATHERINE J.K. SANDOVAL;
CARLA J. PETERMAN; LIANE M.
RANDOLPH, in their official capacities
as Commissioners of the Public Utilities
Commission of the State of California;
and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive,
Defendants.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
[PROPOSED] ORDER
-1-

1
2

[PROPOSED] ORDER
On April 18, 2016, Plaintiff DeSoto Cab Company d/b/a Flywheel Taxi (“Plaintiff”) and

3

Defendants Michael Picker, Mike Florio, Catherine J.K. Sandoval, Carla J. Peterman, and Liane M.

4

Randolph (collectively, “Defendants”), filed a Stipulated Request to Extend Time to File Opposition

5

and Reply Briefing for Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss.

9
10
11
12

1.

Plaintiff shall file its Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss no later than May

2, 2016;
2.

Defendants shall file their Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to

Dismiss no later than May 16, 2016.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

13

16
17

S

RT

19

The Honorable Edward M. Chen
United States District Judge ED

O ORD

IT IS S

dward
Judge E

NO

18

ER

ER

21

n

M. Che

A

H

20

RT
U
O

15

April 19
Dated: ___________, 2016

UNIT
ED

14

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

R NIA

8

deadlines:

FO

7

Based on the stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing, the Court sets the following

LI

6

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
[PROPOSED] ORDER
-2-