Macaraeg v. ABM Security Services, Inc. et al

Filing 15

STIPULATION AND ORDER Requesting Setting Briefing Schedule for Motion to Remand and Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/19/15. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
MICHAEL MACARAEG, on Behalf of
CASE NO. 3:15-cv-04470-RS
Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, and
as Private Attorney General,
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
Plaintiff,
STIPULATED REQUEST TO SET
SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO REMAND,
v.
MOTION TO DISMISS AND CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
ABM SECURITY SERVICES, INC., a
DEADLINES
California Corporation; ABM ONSITE
SERVICES – WEST, INC., a Delaware
Corporation; and DOES 1 through 20,
ACTION FILED: May 1, 2015
inclusive,
ASSIGNED TO: Hon. Richard Seeborg
Defendants.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

3
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO REMAND AND
MOTION TO DISMISS; [PROPOSED] ORDER – CASE NO. 3:15-CV-04470-RS

1
2

[PROPOSED] ORDER
On October 15, 2015, Plaintiff Michael Macaraeg (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants ABM Security

3

Services, Inc. and ABM Onsite Services – West, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) filed a stipulated

4

request to extend and modify certain deadlines associated with anticipated motion practice.

5

Good cause appearing, the Court sets the following deadlines follows:

6
7

ACTION

DEADLINE

8

Plaintiff to File Motion to Remand

Tuesday, October 29, 2015

9

Defendants to File Opposition to Motion to Remand

Tuesday, November 19, 2015

10

Plaintiff to File Reply in Support of Motion To Remand

Thursday, December 3, 2015

11

Hearing on Motion to Remand

December 17, 2015

12

Defendants to File Motion to Dismiss

28 calendar days from date of Court’s
ruling on Motion to Remand

Plaintiff to File Opposition to Motion to Dismiss

21 calendar days from date of filing of
Motion to Dismiss

Defendants to File Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss

14 calendar days from date of filing of
Opposition to Motion to Dismiss

Hearing on Motion to Dismiss

First Thursday after 14 calendar days
from date of filing of Reply in Support
of Motion to Dismiss

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

21
22
23

Dated: ____________, 2015
10/19

___________________________________
The Honorable Richard Seeborg
U.S. District Judge

24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP

4
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO REMAND AND
MOTION TO DISMISS; [PROPOSED] ORDER – CASE NO. 3:15-CV-04470-RS