Macaraeg v. ABM Security Services, Inc. et al

Filing 18

STIPULATION AND ORDER Setting Briefing Schedule for Motion to Transfer and Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/23/15. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/23/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION MICHAEL MACARAEG, on Behalf of CASE NO. 3:15-cv-04470-RS Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, and as Private Attorney General, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff, STIPULATION REQUESTING ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR v. MOTION TO TRANSFER AND MOTION TO DISMISS ABM SECURITY SERVICES, INC., a California Corporation; ABM ONSITE SERVICES – WEST, INC., a Delaware ACTION FILED: May 1, 2015 Corporation; and DOES 1 through 20, ASSIGNED TO: Hon. Richard Seeborg inclusive, Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 4 STIPULATION REQUESTING ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO TRANSFER AND MOTION TO DISMISS; [PROPOSED] ORDER – CASE NO. 3:15-CV-04470-RS 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 On November 20, 2015, Plaintiff Michael Macaraeg (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants ABM 3 Security Services, Inc. and ABM Onsite Services – West, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) filed a 4 stipulated request to extend and modify certain deadlines associated with anticipated motion practice. 5 Good cause appearing, the Court sets the following deadlines follows: 6 7 ACTION DEADLINE 8 Defendant to File Motion to Transfer Thursday, December 17, 2015 9 Plaintiff to File Opposition to Motion to Transfer Thursday, January 14, 2016 10 Defendant to File Reply in Support of Motion to Transfer Thursday, January 28, 2016 11 Hearing on Motion to Transfer February 25, 2016 12 Defendants to File Motion to Dismiss 14 calendar days from date of Court’s ruling on Motion to Transfer Plaintiff to File Opposition to Motion to Dismiss 21 calendar days from date of filing of Motion to Dismiss Defendants to File Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss 14 calendar days from date of filing of Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Hearing on Motion to Dismiss First Available Hearing Date after 14 calendar days from date of filing of Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 23 Dated: ____________, 2015 11/23 ___________________________________ The Honorable Richard Seeborg U.S. District Judge 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 5 STIPULATION REQUESTING ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO TRANSFER AND MOTION TO DISMISS; [PROPOSED] ORDER – CASE NO. 3:15-CV-04470-RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?