Macaraeg v. ABM Security Services, Inc. et al
Filing
18
STIPULATION AND ORDER Setting Briefing Schedule for Motion to Transfer and Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/23/15. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/23/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
MICHAEL MACARAEG, on Behalf of
CASE NO. 3:15-cv-04470-RS
Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, and
as Private Attorney General,
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
Plaintiff,
STIPULATION REQUESTING ORDER
SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
v.
MOTION TO TRANSFER AND MOTION
TO DISMISS
ABM SECURITY SERVICES, INC., a
California Corporation; ABM ONSITE
SERVICES – WEST, INC., a Delaware
ACTION FILED: May 1, 2015
Corporation; and DOES 1 through 20,
ASSIGNED TO: Hon. Richard Seeborg
inclusive,
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP
4
STIPULATION REQUESTING ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO TRANSFER AND
MOTION TO DISMISS; [PROPOSED] ORDER – CASE NO. 3:15-CV-04470-RS
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
On November 20, 2015, Plaintiff Michael Macaraeg (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants ABM
3
Security Services, Inc. and ABM Onsite Services – West, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) filed a
4
stipulated request to extend and modify certain deadlines associated with anticipated motion practice.
5
Good cause appearing, the Court sets the following deadlines follows:
6
7
ACTION
DEADLINE
8
Defendant to File Motion to Transfer
Thursday, December 17, 2015
9
Plaintiff to File Opposition to Motion to Transfer
Thursday, January 14, 2016
10
Defendant to File Reply in Support of Motion to Transfer
Thursday, January 28, 2016
11
Hearing on Motion to Transfer
February 25, 2016
12
Defendants to File Motion to Dismiss
14 calendar days from date of Court’s
ruling on Motion to Transfer
Plaintiff to File Opposition to Motion to Dismiss
21 calendar days from date of filing of
Motion to Dismiss
Defendants to File Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss
14 calendar days from date of filing of
Opposition to Motion to Dismiss
Hearing on Motion to Dismiss
First Available Hearing Date after 14
calendar days from date of filing of
Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
22
23
Dated: ____________, 2015
11/23
___________________________________
The Honorable Richard Seeborg
U.S. District Judge
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP
5
STIPULATION REQUESTING ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO TRANSFER AND
MOTION TO DISMISS; [PROPOSED] ORDER – CASE NO. 3:15-CV-04470-RS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?