Macaraeg v. ABM Security Services, Inc. et al

Filing 31

STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE RE DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR TRANSFER OF VENUE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 2/17/16. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/17/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 CASE NO.: 3:15-cv-04470-RS 12 13 MICHAEL MACARAEG, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, and as Private Attorney General, 14 15 16 17 18 Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE RE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR TRANSFER OF VENUE vs. ABM SECURITY SERVICES, INC., a California Corporation; ABM ONSITE SERVICES – WEST, INC., a Delaware Corporation; and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, 19 20 Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ [Proposed] Order Granting Stipulation to Continue Hearing Date re Defendants’ Motion to Transfer Venue 1 2 3 4 [PROPOSED] ORDER On February 16, 2016, Plaintiff Michael Macaraeg (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants ABM Security Services, Inc. and ABM Onsite Services – West, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) filed a stipulated request to continue the hearing date for Defendants’ motion to transfer venue to the Central 5 District. 6 Good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS the parties’ request. The motion hearing 7 previously set for March 3, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. is continued to March 10, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. in 8 Courtroom 3. 9 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 12 13 2016 2/17 Dated: ____________, 2015 ___________________________________ The Honorable Richard Seeborg United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 _________________________________________________________________________________________________ [Proposed] Order Granting Stipulation to Continue Hearing Date re Defendants’ Motion to Transfer Venue

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?