Sran v. Regents of the University of California
Filing
11
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. ADR Deadline 1/8/2016. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/27/2016 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on December 29, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/29/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
KULGINDER SRAN,
Case No. 15-cv-04471-JST
Plaintiff,
8
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
v.
9
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA,
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
Defendant.
12
Pursuant to the Court’s Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR
13
14
Deadlines, ECF No. 6, the parties were required to have done the following by December 9, 2015:
15
met and conferred regarding initial disclosures, early settlement, ADR process selection, and a
16
discovery plan; filed an ADR Certification signed by Parties and Counsel; and filed either a
17
Stipulation to ADR Process or a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference.
It does not appear that the parties have complied with these deadlines. A discussion of
18
19
ADR in a Joint Case Management Statement does not constitute compliance with the Court’s
20
scheduling order. The Court also recognizes that the parties may have been unable to comply with
21
the December 9, 2015 deadline, given that Defendant did not appear in the case until
22
December 22, 2015.
Accordingly, the Case Management Conference currently scheduled for January 6, 2016 is
23
24
CONTINUED to January 27, 2016. An updated Joint Case Management Statement is not
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
required. The parties are ordered to comply with the above-described ADR obligations by January
2
8, 2016.
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 29, 2015
______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?