Sran v. Regents of the University of California

Filing 11

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. ADR Deadline 1/8/2016. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/27/2016 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on December 29, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/29/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KULGINDER SRAN, Case No. 15-cv-04471-JST Plaintiff, 8 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER v. 9 REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 Defendant. 12 Pursuant to the Court’s Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR 13 14 Deadlines, ECF No. 6, the parties were required to have done the following by December 9, 2015: 15 met and conferred regarding initial disclosures, early settlement, ADR process selection, and a 16 discovery plan; filed an ADR Certification signed by Parties and Counsel; and filed either a 17 Stipulation to ADR Process or a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. It does not appear that the parties have complied with these deadlines. A discussion of 18 19 ADR in a Joint Case Management Statement does not constitute compliance with the Court’s 20 scheduling order. The Court also recognizes that the parties may have been unable to comply with 21 the December 9, 2015 deadline, given that Defendant did not appear in the case until 22 December 22, 2015. Accordingly, the Case Management Conference currently scheduled for January 6, 2016 is 23 24 CONTINUED to January 27, 2016. An updated Joint Case Management Statement is not 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 required. The parties are ordered to comply with the above-described ADR obligations by January 2 8, 2016. 3 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 29, 2015 ______________________________________ JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?