Sran v. Regents of the University of California
Filing
18
SCHEDULING ORDER. Deadline to add parties or amend the pleadings 5/12/2016. Fact discovery cut-off 10/14/2016. Expert disclosures 11/4/2016. Expert rebuttal 11/25/2016. Expert discovery cut-off 12/9/2016. Deadline to file dispositive motions 12/30/2016. Pretrial conference statement due 3/14/2017. Final Pretrial Conference set for 3/24/2017 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 4th Floor, Oakland. Jury Trial set for 4/17/2017 - 5/20/2017 at 8:30 AM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jon S. Tigar. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 27, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
KULGINDER SRAN,
Case No. 15-cv-04471-JST
Plaintiff,
9
v.
SCHEDULING ORDER
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA,
12
Defendant.
13
14
15
The Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10:
16
Event
Deadline
17
Deadline to add parties or amend the pleadings
February 12, 2016
Fact discovery cut-off
October 14, 2016
20
Expert disclosures
November 4, 2016
21
Expert rebuttal
November 25, 2016
22
Expert discovery cut-off
December 9, 2016
Deadline to file dispositive motions
December 30, 2016
Pretrial conference statement due
March 14, 2017
Pretrial conference
March 24, 2017 at
2:00 p.m.
Trial
April 17, 2017 at
8:30 a.m.
18
19
23
24
25
26
27
28
Event
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
Deadline
Estimate of trial length (in days)
10 days
Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with
the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders.
The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire
counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely
manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their
calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can.
Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are
disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, partycontrolled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good cause to grant
a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause
to grant a continuance.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
Dated: January 27, 2016
16
17
18
_______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?