Sran v. Regents of the University of California

Filing 18

SCHEDULING ORDER. Deadline to add parties or amend the pleadings 5/12/2016. Fact discovery cut-off 10/14/2016. Expert disclosures 11/4/2016. Expert rebuttal 11/25/2016. Expert discovery cut-off 12/9/2016. Deadline to file dispositive motions 12/30/2016. Pretrial conference statement due 3/14/2017. Final Pretrial Conference set for 3/24/2017 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 4th Floor, Oakland. Jury Trial set for 4/17/2017 - 5/20/2017 at 8:30 AM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jon S. Tigar. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 27, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 KULGINDER SRAN, Case No. 15-cv-04471-JST Plaintiff, 9 v. SCHEDULING ORDER 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, 12 Defendant. 13 14 15 The Court hereby sets the following case deadlines pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 and Civil Local Rule 16-10: 16 Event Deadline 17 Deadline to add parties or amend the pleadings February 12, 2016 Fact discovery cut-off October 14, 2016 20 Expert disclosures November 4, 2016 21 Expert rebuttal November 25, 2016 22 Expert discovery cut-off December 9, 2016 Deadline to file dispositive motions December 30, 2016 Pretrial conference statement due March 14, 2017 Pretrial conference March 24, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. Trial April 17, 2017 at 8:30 a.m. 18 19 23 24 25 26 27 28 Event 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 Deadline Estimate of trial length (in days) 10 days Counsel may not modify these dates without leave of court. The parties shall comply with the Court’s standing orders, which are available at cand.uscourts.gov/jstorders. The parties must take all necessary steps to conduct discovery, compel discovery, hire counsel, retain experts, and manage their calendars so that they can complete discovery in a timely manner and appear at trial on the noticed and scheduled dates. All counsel must arrange their calendars to accommodate these dates, or arrange to substitute or associate in counsel who can. Trial dates set by this Court should be regarded as firm. Requests for continuance are disfavored. The Court will not consider any event subsequently scheduled by a party, partycontrolled witness, expert or attorney that conflicts with the above trial date as good cause to grant a continuance. The Court will not consider the pendency of settlement discussions as good cause to grant a continuance. IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 Dated: January 27, 2016 16 17 18 _______________________________________ JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?